You are not logged in. Please register or login.
- Topics: Active | Unanswered
#1811 Re: Guns N' Roses » Guns N' Roses Best Buy promotional ads » 916 weeks ago
rolling stone has covered this, although they claim that they are fake cause they were taken down.
http://www.rollingstone.com/rockdaily/i … -internet/
also, they are back on youtube. several people have uploaded them.
#1812 Re: Guns N' Roses » CD and WTTJ comparison » 916 weeks ago
ooh not willing to go the distance again with me
there's a reason they call me war 
#1813 Re: Guns N' Roses » Fernando vs Mysteron » 916 weeks ago
ok cool
i was not around when that info came out
#1814 Re: Guns N' Roses » RS Rock List: Guns N' Roses » 916 weeks ago
joe sixpack
lol
nice
#1815 Re: Guns N' Roses » Fernando vs Mysteron » 916 weeks ago
why 'This I Love?
#1816 Re: Guns N' Roses » CD and WTTJ comparison » 916 weeks ago
war wrote:so i have your permission, buzz?
i disagree without prejudice.....
if you like the demo of one song more than the released version of another. you can assume you will still like the same song better once it is released since it is 99.9 percent more likley to sound even better than the demo version.
Didn't offer or expect anyoe to seek my permission for anything. All I said was that it clearly isn't being objective, which it isn't. Being objective isn't a requirement, it just renders your opinion worthless.
Think of it as the same as me saying one of the songs that nobody has heard yet sucks. Yes, it's an opinion, but it's worthless. Same thing here.
you like to dissmiss good points from other people by not acknowledging them, don't you?
your policy seems to be NOBODY DISAGREES WITH ME, i don't care if they are right.
i just objectively described how somone other than me could fairly compare a new demo to a finished classic and prefer the demo and you responded with a "big Word" and no mechanical points to support it.
FUN FACT 1: opinions are subjective.
an axplanation of how somone could like one better than the other can be objective and mine was and yours could be as well if you made a point rather than throwing insults and punchlines around.
demos are songs that a lot of us have been listening to for years. some are more finished than others. if you like a demo more than a finished version of a differnet song you can compare the two songs that way since demos are rough drafts and you are gonna like the final version even better. i can't possibly be more objective about something as subjective as comparing favorite songs (please see fun fact 1).
nobody's opinion is useless here, buzzsaw.
#1817 Re: Guns N' Roses » Fernando vs Mysteron » 916 weeks ago
war wrote:Axlin08 wrote:Actually that's not true. I've seen Mysteron denounce rumors or try to shoot them down... that turned out TRUE.... just because HE wasn't the first to break it.
He's always been a poser. Just because they're a 'fan', doesn't make them not a douche bag.
what's not true and please provide examples and proof
Mysteron being responsible. He shot down just about all of MSL's info, which was true, including the Nov. 25th release date & the Best Buy exclusive. He initially shot down the Shackler's Revenge stuff, until it was plainly obvious it was true, then suddenly he jumped on board with the whole "the band hopes to have it be the first single".
If Mysteron doesn't have the scoop, his initial reaction is say it's not true. That's the first sign of a 'bullshitter'.
That's recent.
that's really not what i asked for.
i need quotes, context, etc.
without them i really don't need to prove my point cause we all seem to have a completely different recollection of the events than you.
example: shacklers revenge. as soon as the rumor popped mysteron confirmed it. yet you claim something else.
msl doesn't even count. he is not an insider. he is an intruder. anything he says about gnr - the "insiders" that support the band's cause are going to refute whether it is true or not. especailly someone further away from axl, like mysteron. he can afford to take a hit on his character if he is wrong in order to protect the already tarnished gnr name. if gnr came out and denied what msl said that would make them look bad when the rumor came to fruition and they cannot afford that. also, the nov. 25 date was not in stone back then and an intruder can afford to guess where as an insider can't report an incorrect release date, which nov. 25th is looking like it is going to be afterall, incorrect.
both of your reasons that he is fake are baseless until you provide better proof.
everything posted here that i have read, has been true - coming from mysteron. body of lies, rock band, '08 release.
"ALL RECENT" 
the only thing that hasn't is what you give him credot for: sr being the first single. and he said that they were hoping for it to be the first single not that it for sure would be. which seems to be on par for the way this release has unfolded. lot's of playing things by ear/shooting from the hip.
like i said, you seem to have a different recollection of history than most of us so please provide proof to back your points.
#1818 Re: Guns N' Roses » Fernando vs Mysteron » 916 weeks ago
don't get me wrong. i see your point. communication is like the foundation of just about everything. a lack of communication is why we have war, violence, drug abuse, etc. etc. etc.
i am a manager. when i see moral drop the first thing i do is call an all staff meeting.
axl/gnr has poor communication and has costed them atleast a few fans/cd purchases.
but i am telling you to get past his inability to update us and enjoy the home stretch. it is here.
#1819 Re: Guns N' Roses » Guns N' Roses Best Buy promotional ads » 916 weeks ago
This is the most recent thing before today I posted from Saul. This is before we all had heard Shackler.
"Axl + Bucket + Brain + Bumble = Magic."
saul said that?
#1820 Re: Guns N' Roses » Guns N' Roses Best Buy promotional ads » 916 weeks ago
it's been well known for a long time what songs bucket was on and that he would remain on the album . the setlist left no room for surprises (all the leaks and live songs except silkworms). if bucket being on the album is the info that is supposed to come out in a few days then the guy is crazy. of all of the possible announcements/interview that could happen in the next few days i don't see song credits being amongst them, certainly not the focal point.
