The first thing I realized after watching this was that I didn't laugh. I got a chuckle out of the wig/hat moment, but that was it. It seems that almost anybody can make a shit movie look exciting, hilarious, or scary in a two minute trailer. The new GB trailer couldn't do any of that, it just fell flat immediately.

I watched it a few more times and then it really dawned on me, how lazy it appears to be. Ghostbusters wasn't slapstick. It was scary in parts, subtle humor, adult humor, light sexual themes, and a bit of slap stick. This trailer seemed to be all low level comedy aimed at children almost. Just punchlines (which fell flat) for the sake of punchlines, that just happened to occur while wearing a proton pack on their back.

The other thing I noticed which was totally lame, was the stereo-typical loud, black female character. Awwwwhelllllno, SLAP! (Then McCarthy says "Oh that's going to leave a mark." Impressive writing really-are we conjuring Tommy Boy?) The car she picks is a Caddy etc. Could they have tried less here?

Many people made comparisons to Pixels, which made me cringe, but may end up being accurate.

I figured this movie would be a bust, but I was still hopeful they might do something with it. That seems pretty unlikely at this point.

Trump supporters, similar to tea party types, are the most vocal online. I don't think it means much.

I hate the idea of calling it "CD 2"

I'd rather my money be used for education, infrastructure, healthcare, childcare, and the elderly etc. rather than corporations, and/or war profiteers. I think that's one of the main differences between the two parties: How do we want our money allocated for the betterment of society? The choices I see, are socialism for the rich ONLY or socialism for the rest of us. The latter makes much more sense to me.

My favorite Trump line of all time @ 50 seconds: