You are not logged in. Please register or login.
- Topics: Active | Unanswered
#1981 Re: Guns N' Roses » If You Have Any Complaints About The Official Site » 573 weeks ago
My first site was "The Lost Rose" which was a blog I think. Then I found HTGTH, where I stayed for a few years.
#1982 Re: The Garden » The Station Nightclub Fire » 573 weeks ago
That's horrible. The 2:00 is awful, seeing those people trapped almost like zombies all piled up, ashame they couldn't get up & out. Wondering if people toppled over people & that's what caused alot of the deaths, people seems unable to move outside. By 6:00 the thing is gone, and so is everyone inside.
Cramer I'm with you. When this first happened admittedly I was kindof a dick thinking 'Well who goes to a Great White concert in 2003' thinking it was funny. It was some time later where I realized 'you know what, I might have gone there as a joke if they came to my local cover band bar'. I too used to goto similar type bars in my 20s, I saw Stuttering Johns band come thru once, but mostly it was just local cover bands, crammed with 100-200 young adults standing around watching, drinking cheap beer, and looking to hook up. Now they just use Tinder I suppose.
I talked to my brother briefly about this when we saw each other that year. It was the first thing he said was "that was the type of show you'd go to." He knew we like the older bands and see small shows, big shows...whatever.
Panic is an amazing thing. Oddly in that film, I didn't see panic immediately. Probably because the person filming it was first out, as were so many others. But then panic set in, and a bottle neck occured. At least that's what it looks like. I know back in the old days before they had updated fire safety codes, people had died because the doors opened inwards. A fire would start, people would rush the doors, but it would then be impossible to open them.
I found it amazing how quickly the fire spread. Likewise, how quickly a fun moment could morph into a terrifying one. I'm kind of sorry I watched the video to be honest. To me it's worse than watching 911 buildings, it's much more personal.
#1983 Re: The Garden » The Station Nightclub Fire » 573 weeks ago
Jesus Christ man that was horrible. I couldn't watch the whole thing. What makes me more nervous than anything is thinking that this is the exact type of show my wife and I would have gone to.
#1984 Re: Guns N' Roses » NOTHING TO SEE HERE!!! » 574 weeks ago
I'll take an inebriated middle aged hoochie, directly affiliated with Duff's spouse, talking out the side of her botox frozen mug over an online "insider" any day of the week.
And perhaps we should take heed of GnR's "read between the lines" tweet. That photo Duff included is no mistake or coincidence. In fact it's pretty darn straight forward if you ask me.
#1985 Re: Guns N' Roses » NOTHING TO SEE HERE!!! » 574 weeks ago
To be honest, this is the last thing i would have expected just a few months ago. Gawd please let it be true.
#1986 Re: Guns N' Roses » Cat out of the bag? » 574 weeks ago
The girl who cuts my hair just told me that there is a new single in the works. Apparently it's a rework of the 2002 demo "My Favorite Pillow."
Slash is going to replace Bumble's parts, who originally redid Bucket's work on this demo, whom I'm told originally built upon a riff that Slash recorded for Axl back in '95, which was the inspiration for MFP in the first place.
#1987 Re: Guns N' Roses » Cat out of the bag? » 574 weeks ago
Smoking Guns wrote:There are about 5 new GNR tweets...
They range from
"Whatever happened to no news is good news"
"Read between the lines"
"Everyone is a journalist"
"If they could read lips"
Hmmm
Thanks for posting these
I take this as confirmation from Guns that nothing has changed in regards to their plans, but I'm guessing you interpret it as the reunion talks being full steam ahead behind the scenes
Comments from Axl/GnR have no sub-flooring. Therefore, No News = No News.
#1988 Re: Guns N' Roses » Cat out of the bag? » 574 weeks ago
We're on the verge of what appears to be a classic GnR reunion. The idea of Robin returning is just....fer Chrissake man, c'mon.
#1989 Re: The Garden » Donald Trump running for President » 576 weeks ago
I don't get it. How is Carson ahead of Trump in the polls? What is the draw?
The primaries are generally more rigid, anti-establishment conservatives who shun status quo candidates. The previous election was pretty much the same thing, Bachman, Perry etc, all had their moment in the sun, before the party finally picked Romney. This time around was the same story, except that Trump had tremendous staying power. Carson now moves into the top spot for a while, before eventually fading away as well. I don't expect Trump or Carson to be serious contenders at all.
What's left is Rubio, Bush and Kasich as more realistic options for the GOP candidate. Bush apparently is running out of money and supporters. Kasich despite his moderate approach (he's not that moderate) will be seen as RINO by the base. Which leaves Rubio, who IMO is completely not ready for prime time. Yes he's good at talking points to the base, but he's inexperienced, poor off the cuff, often nervous and Hillary would eat his lunch in a debate. I can see him in a Veep spot, but no way as POTUS material.
I do suspect the GOP will want Rubio because they feel he appeals to Latins. But the Republicans forget that Cubans and Mexicans aren't the same thing. Likewise, if Hillary picks Castro as her Veep, then she'll lock up the Latin vote (which already trends left to begin with) for sure.
All in all, as you said, it's a very weak field. The GOP has created this problem though. They catered to fringe ideologues, hyper religious constituents, gun fanatics etc and now must answer to their new bosses. This leaves no room for a moderate candidate, and why the GOP despise anybody they suspect may not hold dear their beliefs on abortion, religion, guns, middle east policy, privatization and so on.
#1990 Re: Management » "dexter" hack at GNR Evo (Split from "Holy Shit" thread) » 576 weeks ago
That's what I'm lead to believe.
I know my initial response after re-opening the forum was kind of vague, but it took me 5-6 hours to upgrade our forum software and re-apply all of our modifications, so I was kinda burnt out by the end.... and then we were bombarded with 200+ spam accounts
....
This is quite a bit of information you're volunteering here. Not sure how safe this is to convey this all publicly. But you know better than I do.
I'd imagine if somebody were to hack an anonymous profile, they'd pick one that was not in use first. Otherwise flags would go up, and the true user would report it to a Moderator. The hacker could do a test run with a smiley, or small comment, and then proceed with more nefarious actions if they went undetected. However it would be quite the coincidence to pick an unused account that just happened to belong to Axl Rose. Likewise, as you said, if the intentions were malicious why not just pick a Moderator or Admin profile instead? You'd get keys to all kinds of goodies then.
As for the spam accounts registering after the fact, it was probably connected. I have (and currently) run a forum with similar series of events. In my case it may be a dormant spam account, registered but never posted. Then one day it comes to life (so to speak) and may post something rather innocuous. If nothing happens after the initial post the spam begins and I have an onslaught of new registrants, all of which are spambots from Eastern Europe.
I had to close my forum, and turn off registrations at one point too. I have since put measures in place to combat this and reopened registrations.
Still though, what kind of coincidence is it that it was Dexter's account, replying directly to one of my smarmy comments about Axl? That wouldn't make sense for a spambot testing the waters. A spambot would post something completely random. There was human thought behind that response to me.
Either way, I'm wearing a condom from now on when I post, and I suggest the rest of you weirdos follow suit.

I take this as confirmation from Guns that nothing has changed in regards to their plans, but I'm guessing you interpret it as the reunion talks being full steam ahead behind the scenes 

