You are not logged in. Please register or login.

#11 Re: Guns N' Roses » Slash in CD sessions 2001? Illusions reunion in 96? » 686 weeks ago

Smoking Guns wrote:

Jarmo probably won't post this on his site. Lol...

well has he? Hmmm??

#12 Re: Guns N' Roses » Slash in CD sessions 2001? Illusions reunion in 96? » 686 weeks ago

buzzsaw wrote:
ninic wrote:
tejastech08 wrote:

16

roll
Don't get why folks get giddy when others try to have a go at Axl's inner circle, how they're relationship is none of our biz but if anything she might actually get the point, I worry about Mrs. Slash and/or Steve's mom for the sake of debate.

Well, I think Slash's mom died a few years ago.  Ignoring that, none of them are managing their fake son's career into the ground.  When fake mom's and fake brothers and sisters do stuff like that, people notice.

umm I didn't mean Slash's mom, just Steven's don't ignore 13 lol  also who knows how she' managed Axl into whatever, he's still his own person, I'd at least rather have folks blame him for HIS own decisions, just something seemingly sexist in regards to blaming women (not that I'm claiming you are) for ex. Yoko, Nico and other women around famous bands.  Then again Axl's gotten enough so I guess shift some around Beta lol nevermind

#13 Re: Guns N' Roses » Slash in CD sessions 2001? Illusions reunion in 96? » 686 weeks ago

tejastech08 wrote:
A Private Eye wrote:

Canter might think that wives, girlfriends, managers would be miles away should reunion talks ever be a reality, I'm not so sure, I can certainly think of one 'mom' who will be hard to shake off.

16

roll
Don't get why folks get giddy when others try to have a go at Axl's inner circle, how they're relationship is none of our biz but if anything she might actually get the point, I worry about Mrs. Slash and/or Steve's mom for the sake of debate.

#14 Re: Guns N' Roses » Slash in CD sessions 2001? Illusions reunion in 96? » 686 weeks ago

johndivney wrote:

interesting people are finally starting to question axl's finances publicly - by that i mean not us on the msgboards but stern/truck & now canter in a press interview.

i know it's all speculation but i'd say he prob has healthy personal wealth, but in terms of the GnR organisation i dunno so much. it may account for the neverending tour - a vicious cycle unto itself if the case: if you consider the late starts/curfew breaks that are still the rule rather than exception, the profit will never be as great as it could be after all these years even w/o the [real] top-hatted one..

ty apex-twin btw. very revealing interview all told.

Umm btw that was Stern just shooting off lol I doubt he knows how much Axl's got stashed away though, well then again neither does any of us.

lol I love how folks work in another  " real top hatted" reference, though it may/is true still it's not helping matters in regards to Axl and his feelings on the matter so suffice it to say, he won't STILL care (for the record neither does DJ, hell he respects him so bother to get him still?). To Bono, no one will ignore shit so give that a rest, dear.  Hell they both know what happened between them so both need to stop with the "I don't know why he's angry, what he wants from me" BS (Slash mainly)

something else that went down between them that we'll never know.  (Women, songs, money, maybe even sexual tension b/t, (well it is LA:nervous:)  hell I dunno at this point everything else has been discussed to death lol )

#15 Re: Guns N' Roses » RRHoF Discussion (Izzy/Slash/Axl Press Statements) » 686 weeks ago

umm some don't get SARCASM, he knows he was getting ravaged lol but yes he is probably happy that ANYONE at this point has his back.  Whether you like the Lebeis fam or not, they have his back/care for him personally and not just as some puppet to just go out and "tap dance/sing" whenever they want him to and shit and may always will have his back.

#16 Re: Guns N' Roses » GN’R screenplay in the works » 686 weeks ago

buckfast, man up your standards lol!

#17 Re: Guns N' Roses » So Back to normal or whatever? » 686 weeks ago

Intercourse wrote:

Sane GNR fans are like bears, we go into hibernation when there is nothing to feed on then come running back out when a feast looks possible.

I'll be tailing Slash's tour and album, seeing GNR & Chris Cornell, Dublin 2012, watching for VR and waiting for GNR CD II.

Its not ideal, but not bad either.

The first part would be ideal and we would go on about our lives but some of us we egg on anyone who claims to have a whif of of a new leak (MSL) and then wonder why Axl hardly speaks on the net and when he does it isn't pretty lol:haha:

#18 Re: Guns N' Roses » So Back to normal or whatever? » 686 weeks ago

johndivney wrote:
ninic wrote:

cause he definitely has to prove a point now, at this point

don't mean to cause offense, but this is some bs.

he has "had to prove" a point or 1000 before this latest debacle.

it is not "back to" anything (& certainly nothing near normal!)
things remain as they've always been - on axl time.

the rnrhof was just another blip. it wasn't a seismic shift in the make-up of GnR.
the net result of it is simply: anyone left daft or deluded enough to care or have thoughts of an AFD/UYI reunion should have finally be disabused of those wishes. it's only a few more people have joined the rest of us in reality.

it is closer to 'whatever'. what you're left w/is the same situation we've faced for over a decade: you place your fandom @ the feet of axl's truculent whimsy & wait/hope as best you can - or you say "fuck it/catch you later" - or you can be an asshole about it & post on the internet how axl ruined everything.
me? i like to do all 3.


but yea. this rnrhof shit hasn't altered the picture one bit for me. maybe it's clarified it somewhat for others. like walter sobchak some nutjobs have taken this as the excuse to "draw a line in the sand", but to me they just haven't been following the script from the past 20yrs.....
the more things change the more they stay the same w/axl.

no offense taken now I hope you don't take this the wrong way but boo hooey, some needs to stop pretending being "taken a back/or disgusted at Axl" and get over Axl and his "ways" yes he does have something too prove, and I  hope he has a fire lit under his behind to actually RELEASE music just like I said at first.  He is truly now public enemy no.1  (well not like he wasn't at first;) but still he has the whole word on him and he can either go back into the nest, just randomly tour to pay off debts or whatever or shut a few folks up (he won't be able to win over most but still) with some new music.

oh and of course post about how Axl ruined everything lol everyone else does so (whether it's true or not), well why not?

#19 Re: Guns N' Roses » RRHoF Discussion (Izzy/Slash/Axl Press Statements) » 687 weeks ago

misterID wrote:

The lawsuits probably have a lot to do with Axl's anger. The songwriting process with Slash and their frictions there. Plus, whatever Axl sees as him lying. Like, for 16 years they let it float out there that Axl hijacked the name by holding them hostage backstage at a show... Duff cleared that up. Why did it take 16 years to do it when they all KNEW the rumors. I actually heard Matt recount this very rumor on the Monsters show in Orlando, and not only did he say it happened, but said he was a part of it and signed over his rights.... He never had any rights to the name.

And in Axl's mind, he probably sees the negative things Slash has said as a direct attack on his attempts to ressurect his career, which he's alluded to that there have been legal things between he and Slash that were major road blocks in that.

Clearing this up is very touchy. I think if Slash went on the Trunk show and just totally cleared the air, instead of the "no comments" he always does, and Axl actuall came out and said what the problem is between them... It would go a long way.

I think we have a winner here, I mean letting rumors that do damage like that float around for I dunno how long?  And then expect the man to just pop up like Gene Wilder in Willy Wonka when he was faking being crippled with that cane, with a big smile on his face like nothing happened. Then again he, Axl, did also do some sh*t so maybe  hell I dunno things are too jacked to even go back to the way they were or start over on fresh terms, who knows, none of us will truly know the whole story.

#20 Guns N' Roses » So Back to normal or whatever? » 687 weeks ago

ninic
Replies: 37

So after "some" of us when we kind of get over the "I hate you Axl, you think everything is everyone's fault, you suck, I have no respect for you, you're a little bitch, a fool, a boy," and tons of  other stuff


well now what, wait for the tour or whatever, new music?  Well given that he's challenged pretty much now to release new stuff  cause he definitely has to prove a point now, at this point

Board footer

Powered by FluxBB