You are not logged in. Please register or login.

#2321 Re: Guns N' Roses » Chinese Democracy Chart Positions Thread » 935 weeks ago

I really do think that there was sometihng in the 2006 reunion rumours, although it was about only 1 or 2 shows (Download festival would hzave been one of them). Lars Ulrich was talking about it, Ross Halfin was talking about it, Slash and Duff dropped the lawsuit.

I even remember an article where the author said the papers were ready to be signed, but one of the lawyers noticed a little change: everybody would have signed away all their rights regarding the back catalogue etc. to one person. Guess who. Then Axl came up with the Slash visit press release (two versions!) and it was all over. I guess Axl used the reunion only as a tool to get everything. When he didn't succeed, he tried to dmage slash as much as he can.

I think none of the guys want to sign anything with Axl in the next few years and axl doesn't really want to tam up with anyone, including his old buddies and his new band. Either he'll retire or just take another few years break. Do you remember the summer Baz interview where he mentions asking Axl if the redhead would do a VH1 reality show for 1 million bucks? Axl said he'd play 2 million just to be left alone. Axl lost all his interest in the whole thing months ago. I just want him to be a man and say 'I'm gone for God knows how long. Enjoy the album and blame Canada. Axl'

#2322 Re: Guns N' Roses » Chinese Democracy Chart Positions Thread » 935 weeks ago

To tell the truth, as much as I am a fan of the old line-up(s), I don't see a reunion happening or turning out for good. If Axl can kill his own album then what can we expect when he'd tour with Slash, Duff and Izzy? Granted, on a tour a lot of things turn out differently how Axl wants it. His beef isn't ready in time, or the big egos crash. Sorry, I think Axl is not interested in a reunion and he will not be in the foreseeable future. Neither Slash, as I see it. It'd take months or years of negotiations between the camps and we all know hos often Axl will not appear for whatever reasons. The others would nix it, even if they're into in the beginning. I really don't seem them working together again, the guys are like in a different universe. It'd need a miracle to happen.

#2323 Re: Guns N' Roses » Chinese Democracy Chart Positions Thread » 935 weeks ago

Maybe not everything turned out how he wanted in the end, we can only guess, but even if that's the case, you don't fuck up your career defining album. Unless you are insane. The only true explanation for me (if he's not crazy) would be that over the years he's grown to HATE his album and now don't wanna do anything for it just let it die.

#2324 Re: Guns N' Roses » Chinese Democracy Chart Positions Thread » 935 weeks ago

I still don't understand Axl's silence, unless he's really crazy. His silence doesn't fuck up his record company, Universal got most/a lot of its money back from the Best Buy deal. He fucks with the fans? Well, thank you if that's the case, but it's not that hard to live through another silent Axl period.

The only ones he fucks real hard with this silence are himself and the guys who worked their asses off to make the record Axl wanted. It's some kind of self-destruction. Build something for more than a decade, even killing an awesome band to reach that 'vision', spending a lot of (own) money on it, saying through the management that 'we will have the last laugh' and the 'album will show who as the heart and soul of Guns N' Roses', then nothing, when he surely knows that every album needs promo. CD's mystery's gone a lon time ago, now not the mystic, but the unveil of secrets would pump up interest. Anyway, he doesn't speak and doesn't go anywhere public. I can't get it. roll


So either he's in the derpessive stage of his bipolarity or he's doing it for some purpose, in the end it's just him being crazy.

#2326 Re: Guns N' Roses » Chinese Democracy Chart Positions Thread » 935 weeks ago

mickronson wrote:

has anyone actually heard anything other than VR? you all keep mentioning VR as a reference to diss.. believe it or not, VR isnt the best theyve all done..
Gnr is still new remember.. sex with someone new is always nice.. it gets old like always tho

Yeah, I think 5 O'Clock is the best album by any GN'R-member post 1991. CD and Ain't Life Grand are tied.

#2327 Re: The Sunset Strip » polluxlm Discover the Classics - Goats Head Soup (1973) » 935 weeks ago

My new found classic is Their Satanic Majestic's Request. A masterpiece, but really different than anything the Stones did. They were so full of drugs that made an experimental album. I don't know what would have happened if they had followed that path.

#2328 Re: Guns N' Roses » Amazon rips Chinese Democracy » 935 weeks ago

jamester062001 wrote:

try to remember...AFD was a flop for what a year?..

That was an unknown band. Now it's one of the top brands of the music history.

#2329 Re: Guns N' Roses » Chinese Democracy Chart Positions Thread » 935 weeks ago

polluxlm wrote:

It tells me what I've been saying. VR didn't achieve success because they had a great album, they did it because it carried the GN'R name and people were craving for something new. Once the buzz was over people carried on.

It's ridiculous. If that were the case, it would have sold well in the first week and then tanked. Slither and Fall to Pieces were massive rock hits. CD is likely to tank after 1 week. Guess it's because the world is so anti-talent, therefore extremely anti-Axl. Gimme a break.


I hate these VR vs. Axl-GN'R debates though.

#2330 Re: Guns N' Roses » Chinese Democracy Elimination Round 1 » 935 weeks ago

polluxlm wrote:
Neemo wrote:
polluxlm wrote:

13 votes, 8 different songs.

thats pretty telling to show that there isnt a clear cut track on this thing that will puxh for mainstream acceptance...and before someone goes off on how mainstream success doesnt matter...it does if you want better sales...and to those who say sales dont matter...then why the fuck ya bitching about a #3 debut 16

It also shows people have a hard time defining what is bad on this album. A sign of strength and diversity.

To tell the truth I could vote off half of the album easily. Shackler, If The World, CITR, Rhiad, Madagascar, Prostitute isn't really doing anything for me. 3-4 songs of the remaining bunch are quite great, though.
It'd be a solid album with that ratio, problem is it took 15 years. If Axl dropped albums of CD quality in every 3 years, talking or no talking, nobody would complain.

Board footer

Powered by FluxBB