You are not logged in. Please register or login.
- Topics: Active | Unanswered
#4421 Re: Guns N' Roses » POLL: BH Returning? » 930 weeks ago
I'll give up sex for...umm...6....no...3 months if he comes back. Fuck that, I'll suck a cock to bring him back. I'll do Pitman even. Dizzy too.
No, I'm not kidding.
But will he? All my sense and logic says no, but my GN'R hope hopeoufys (located to the left behind your right ear. takes years of bitterness and failures to develop) whispers a tiny miny 'yes'.
My shrink tells me to stop listening to the hopeoufys though, so what do I know?
#4422 Re: Guns N' Roses » Shackler's Revenge: REALLY confirmed » 930 weeks ago
Mysteron on HTGTH:
"The band are hoping to have 'Shackler's Revenge' as their first single and they are also hoping to have the new album out this year. I know this falls in the 'vague' category but is all I can give right now."
Not as bad as it looks. They are wise to not jump any guns this time around.
It's looking more promising than the Harley stuff though, definitely.
Fuckin' hilarious that gnr.com is way behind as usual. When is that admin gonna get the can? 
#4423 Re: Guns N' Roses » Shackler's Revenge: REALLY confirmed » 930 weeks ago
Worst happens we get a brand new song deemed fit to feature in a commercial game, ie. it's good.
That's really enough for me.
#4424 Re: The Garden » Favorite Stand-Up Comedian » 930 weeks ago
Those are not accusations. Some of his material are basically blueprints of Hicks material.
But they are still different types of comedians, so yeah, matter of taste.
#4425 Re: Guns N' Roses » Shackler's Revenge: REALLY confirmed » 930 weeks ago
Somebody's sounding like a broken record
It could be, but there's an ocean of difference between Buckethead and Guns N' Roses. There's no reason for him to release a single since nobody knows who he is. Axl and Guns on the other hand...they can, should and will release some sort of single. You don't put it in people's hands to discover a new song from this type of album.
#4426 Re: Guns N' Roses » Shackler's Revenge: REALLY confirmed » 930 weeks ago
Del James has confirmed it as well.
Del James Del James
Gebruiker blokkeren
Verwijderen uit Vriendenmyspace.com/thelanguageoffear
Datum:
14 jul 2008, 10:41
Markeer als Spam of meld Misbruik [?]
Help: Markeren
Bericht Als je een bericht ontvangt dat spam blijkt te zijn, kun je de markeringsfunctie gebruiken om dit aan ons te melden. Wanneer je een bericht hebt gemarkeerd, wordt dit verwijderd uit je inbox en geanalyseerd door ons anti-misbruiksysteem. Alvast bedankt voor je hulp bij het schoon houden van MySpace Mail!Titel:
RE: rockband 2
Tekst:
The answer is yes!
----------------- Original Message -----------------
From: ronald
Date: Jul 14, 2008 12:58 AMhey man do ya know if its true that a new song from guns n roses is gonna be on rockband 2
i understand if ya aren't allowed to answer this but really would love it if ya do
greetings ronald
ps loved ya book
Volgende >>
Gesponsorde links
Op zoek naar Thuiswerk?
#4427 Re: The Garden » Post Your Pic Thread - Let's see what you look like! » 930 weeks ago
These are from last weeks Roskilde. Some great memories.
Rockin' out to Jay Z. I don't particularly like rap, but damn it's good to make fun of it.
MC Dark Poet feat. Slim Commie
You talkin' to me?
Frozen in time
We can be totally gay if we want to
Give these guys some meds!
Not as easy as it looks
Fuckin' hell that was a fun vacation.:rock::bed::smile::thumbup:
#4428 Re: The Garden » Favorite Stand-Up Comedian » 930 weeks ago
Bill Hicks. The one and only.
#4429 Re: Guns N' Roses » Shackler's Revenge: REALLY confirmed » 930 weeks ago
:wtf::drool:
Fingers crossed. Prayer delivered.
#4430 Re: The Garden » An Iran Attack Scenario » 930 weeks ago
I respect your courage to fight for what you believe in Randall.
As for a war with Iran, I don't see the logic. Granted, the neo-cons have their vision of an american controlled middle east, but here they are clearly out of touch with reality. It all reminds me of Hitlers decision to attack Poland, thinking the allies wouldn't have the balls to respond.
And what's the goal really? The administration has clearly showed that morals is limited to Fleischers mouth, so it's not about protecting the world from nuclear missiles. And even if it were, an operation not involving ground troops would have a high uncertainty as to actually dismantling their program. You don't risk war with Russia if you can't even be sure to reach your objective. Ground troops and occupation will have to be applied if anything meaningful is to come out of it. The military forces are strechted out enough already, so an invasion would require either a draft or the rerouting of forces stationed elsewhere. So it's either risking positions abroad or at home, and for what? So that they get one step closer to a neo-utopian vision that's already falling apart by destroying a nation with no real significance to US security?
Luckily there seems to be minds of reason in military and intelligence circles who's trying to avoid such a scenario.
Then again, if Iran doesn't abandon their program, and I don't think they will, how is the US going to avoid an incredibly embarrassing defiance like that without taking action? There's a lot of prestige invested. The situation is closely resembling a clusterfuck where all options will lead to war.
What happened to the world we had in 1991?
