You are not logged in. Please register or login.
- Topics: Active | Unanswered
#5621 Re: Guns N' Roses » Axl can't make Videos without Robin Finck & Buckethead » 911 weeks ago
Summer 2009? The CD hype won't survive that long. It will be a 2006 tour all over again.
#5622 Re: Guns N' Roses » I have Post Traumatic Release Disorder!!! » 911 weeks ago
It's Erin or Stephanie or Slash or the fans or a manager or a producer, or insert pretty much anybody in Axl's life that had the nerve to stand up to him. The dude is nuts. We all are to some extent imo, but he takes it to the next level. Some of that is what makes him a superstar, but some of it makes him impossible to deal with if you have an opinion that is different than his.
This was supposed to be his crowning acheivement, yet he releases a very imperfect album with a less perfect set of liner notes. How does that happen?
#5623 Re: Guns N' Roses » Is "Sorry" Axl's F.U. to the fans? » 911 weeks ago
I think the fact that this discussion is even taking place is a compliment to the lyrics. You all could be right, you all could be wrong. Either way, Axl wrote another song that makes you think instead of spelling it out for you.
I'm not a fan of the song yet, but I've changed my mind on the lyrics as a result of this thread.
#5624 Re: Guns N' Roses » For the record..... » 911 weeks ago
most people prefer slash, duff, izzy, and matt or steven. i do too. i guess that means they are lining up behind you. sounds to me like they are lining up behind the musicians.
what's "dead dude"? are you forgetting a comma?
my post that you did not like was a repsonse to dtj and it was on topic. quite frankly, i'd prefer it if i were talking to myself at this point.
i thought i asked you to pm me...
dead due = ole
wish he was dead dude = Tracii
Come on man...if you're going to pretend to be clever, you're going to have to keep up.
#5625 Re: Guns N' Roses » For the record..... » 911 weeks ago
honestly, i never said anything that was untrue but buzz and i tend to argue, regardless. that is when the mods usually jump in. that is why i kept asking him to pm me but no messages. he usually and unilaterally proclaims his own victory, right before he leaves
Man, if only you were as good in real life as you are in your mind...
I'm not pming you. There's no point to it. You ask for it only to look like the "good guy" while you keep posting to the thread. No, I played your game before and there's no need to replay it.
#5626 Re: Guns N' Roses » For the record..... » 911 weeks ago
who's "they"? you can' start a sentence with "they" unlesss it is already presented, which it wasn't.
and, yes, you could do this for hours. that is why nobody likes you.
Amazingly, I have people lining up behind me. Wait, let me guess...you didn't read those posts properly either?
Ok, enough of that. So now you're going to use correct grammar? OK, lets run with that. Duff was never mentioned in the conversation, so the only "they" that were brought up were dead dude and wish he were dead dude. So tell me when I brought up both Slash and Duff in the discussion? Who else could "they" have been referring to other than the only "they" that were brought up?
In other words, using your own logic, you still were having a conversation with yourself that had nothing to do with the rest of the conversation. I know you're going to respond with some blabber about me not getting it even though I've used your own words to prove you wrong...I've got your game down.
#5627 Re: Guns N' Roses » For the record..... » 911 weeks ago
Sure it's been a crazy ride getting here but it's here so why dwell on what justifies what is and what's not GNR...Again.
Honestly? Because now it's real. A legacy can't be tarnished by an imaginary album, but it can by a piece of crap album. These songs are ok to good (except Shacklers), but are ruined by production and too much shit going on - add to that a booklet written by war, and you get a joke of an album that was already the butt of all the jokes in the industry.
That isn't the band I love.
#5628 Re: Guns N' Roses » For the record..... » 911 weeks ago
buzzsaw wrote:I guess that explains why they were removed from the recording contract in the same press release that Slash was, right? Or was it some other press release? Very objective. Nice job.
there ya go, buzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz
i'm off to work
pm me with your next (waste of my time) tidbits, k?
They would be dead dude and wish he was dead dude. How would Slash and Duff be removed from the contract in the same press release that Slash was removed from? Was Slash on there twice? Did he clone himself? Was one sober Slash and the other was doped up Slash? Wonder twin powers, activate...form of two Slashs?
I could do this for hours, but out of respect for others (and thank God you're going to work) this conversation is over.
#5629 Re: Guns N' Roses » For the record..... » 911 weeks ago
yeah and i was responded to a moderator's comment on the same subject. i think i am safe. what you want to follow shortly...........
Incoherent rambling that I cannot even make fun of much less respond to. Nice one...I guess you got me again. Congrats.
English. Learn it, use it.
#5630 Re: Guns N' Roses » For the record..... » 911 weeks ago
buzzsaw wrote:I guess that explains why they were removed from the recording contract in the same press release that Slash was, right? Very objective. Nice job.
dude, what does that have to do with slash and duff not being gnr anymore?
anyone that says this is not gnr is being subjective because..
this is gnr, whether you like it or not and you haven't given me one objective reason why i am wrong.
you're too busy changing the subject
I'm pretty sure I never said they were...in fact, I'm certain of it. And you're accusing me of changing the subject? You're discussing a subject with yourself that doesn't even exist in this thread. Fascinating. 
Go back and read what I said. I'm not going to keep repeating myself and pissing off more people by doing so. I've stated my case - you don't have to agree with it, in fact, I'm not asking you to. You sir are a waste of time.
