I will agree with that comparison. Jen certainly plays to the girl-next-door, whereas Angie is very much the "bombshell", femme fatale gimmick.

Regardless of whether people like Jolie or not, she's gorgeous. Almost too much so. Most men think someone like her wouldn't walk across the street to throw a drink in their face.

Aniston on the other hand probably reminds men of girls they knew, that had that "i'm pretty, but I don't know i'm pretty", and men are REALLY attracted to that.

I just can't remember the last girl from Hollywood that I saw that had that girl-next-door quality, and was beautiful. Natalie Portman maybe? Jessica Biel maybe?

It's been a while, and Mila Kunis doesn't count. She's FAR too European looking.

Ronald Reagan referred to it as "the silent majority" and they're still out there. The majority of the American people, the ones who DON'T VOTE, that are the sane ones, go about their life and they are crazies who think killing their baby fetuses is "empowering" and at the same time don't think blowing up abortion clinics is God's work. That's fanaticism.

They're in the middle somewhere. Like most normal people. Life is complicated, and we/they take it on a day-by-day basis.

Unfortunately, even in the other developed countries, it is EVEN MORE of a concern for the Globalists, because it's a money scam. In many cases the "non-Globalist" groups are actually secretly funded by the other, and pump their agenda info into the media as well as policy. Thus the reason the UN is at the head of all this radical "progress".

They're trying to convince the masses that their lives depend on this, so they'll knee-jerk and make irrepairable decisions about the future of Earth, and primarily its economic policies. I'm not one of those economic doomsdayers, I just calls it likes I sees it.

I remember back in 2008, Al Gore making the rounds telling everyone that if immediate global change wasn't made with Global Warming (what it was called WAY back then), and that if we didn't make immediate changes that the universal temperature would be like 127 degrees Fahrenheit, people wouldn't be able to spend more than 5 minutes outside without having a heat stroke, and a gallon of Milk would cost $12 bucks or something like that (I could be mis-remembering the numbers). And he was totally SUPER SERIAL about it too!!!

Needless to say Milk is an outrageous $3.60 a gal. where i'm at and it's Raining buckets outside at about 50 degrees F. Yeah man... i'm burning up.

The problem for Bernie is he's having to embrace the Liberal/Dem class system in order to appeal to Hilary voters. Or at least that's what his advisors are telling him. Alot of his concepts are imo AHEAD of their time for America. Yes -- AHEAD.

With growing transhumanism in this country, and computers taking more and more jobs, unemployment still hasn't recovered (people are just dropping out of the system Obama, that's not LOWERING Umemployment--idiot), the U.S.A. is going to have to eventually have a serious -- ADULT -- conversation without crazy ass Neo-cons interupting or Stalin-ists from the left. An actual bi-partisan discussion about "Floor Wage".

There is going to come a time, soon, where it'll make FAR FAR FAR more sense to just pay everyone in America a flat wage, like $30,000 a year, whether they work or not. But when you get that, you get NO health care, ATF is shut down, DEA is shut down, Medicare is shut down, Planned Parenthood is shut down, the Military is BROUGHT HOME (no more Wars), drugs are legalized and massively regulated, and cut the shit out of Government to pay for, YET maintain the tax system and/or alter it.

It's going to be a problem. A REAL problem in the coming decades. It'll just be easier to do it this way. But because it involves using a Conservate "Cut Wasteful Spending" idea with a Socialist "maintain regulation & balance over state-controlled capitalism" issue mixed with a Libertarian "Legalize and swim in money" issue... It'll NEVER HAPPEN. Never.

We might even save money in the end. I don't think people grasp the TRILLIONS we waste on needless Wars and the Black Money that goes to Black projects that is just invisible money, while the rest of us Sheep keep chasing "the American Dream".

I was making an example to say how getting that eclectic group together would shake it up, and be more outside the box.

I do agree that the Electoral system is entirely broken. Alot of people don't even realize that the Popular Vote -- MEANS ABSOLUTELY NOTHING. Nothing. The popular vote only means something if it's in a state with massive electoral votes, such as the big swing states like Iowa, California, and Florida.

I agree the system is without a doubt -- VERY broken. Candidates don't even campaign for the goal of winning the people's vote. People in Florida don't even ask themselves why it seems EVERY DAY there's some other candidate coming to their hometown to win their vote. They don't pay any attention to it, because they are surrounded by it. The reality is they show up because they want those electoral votes, and it should by proxy, completely nullify the vote meaning anything.

What hurts America even more is that they have been indoctrinated by the state department in their high school & college history/government classes that the Electoral system is the CORNERSTONE of the American political system.

So they tie the broken system in with being the true birth rite of a Patriot. People fight to keep the system that keeps them enslaved and right where they are at.

I also wish we had a system like other countries where you could only campaign for about a month, and move on. This being able to run for President TWO YEARS before the actual election, and the media here in America, ALL THEY TALK ABOUT IS THIS for the 2 years leading up to the actual election, ad nauseum.

It's a fixed, Plato's Cave JOKE.

Yeah, we've all had those experiences, but tbh, mine are a bit more positive. There have been not one, but two girls that I really liked (for some reason), waited and waited, chickenshitted out of asking them out, and didn't.

Later I re-connected with them and found out, just by being put in a position of being around them daily that.... I didn't miss out on a thing. I romanticized the whole thing and found out it was never going to work out and it wouldn't have lasted anyways. Completely incompatible.

But then again... there are the others. The ones I still think about. The ones where the sexual tension was there, mutually, and we just didn't... go there. Wanted to, but didn't. Some were with other people, some were in different places, and those are the ones I always think of. The ones that got away.

"To all the girls I didn't love before"

Agreed, and it seems to be the only logical explanation as to why he's there, and not an equal member of the band in this new "re-grouping" as they call it. Same with Izzy. Izzy doesn't want to be involved.

But I don't feel that because Dizzy made (in theory) that decision, that it warrants people acting like it "confirms he was ALWAYS a touring piano player. He's not GN'R "

Come the fuck on. That shit was why I started this debate to begin with. It's unfair, I don't buy it, he's got 2nd seniority with GN'R and has never left nor never been disloyal, he's written songs with Axl.

Dizzy is original GN'R, regardless of business arrangement. I just don't understand why he's been dropped from the brand recognition, being he's IN THE HALL OF FAME with the other three and has 25 years of service. That part stumps me.

End point

I think people are reading too much into the above videos with Soundgarden.

Ben is a very no-nonsense, no bullshit, Glenn Frey-type of guy

Chris is a very Seattle, hipster, indie rock dude, that's kinda cool sometimes and can get up his own ass sometimes

They're brothers. I just saw the above video as Chris doing his thang and Ben doing his thang. I do notice in videos when Chris tries to be funny, he finds HIMSELF very funny, and others kind of don't get the joke. The reaction of SG is always the same... Kim is laid back and smiles, Matt nervously laughs, and Ben rolls his eyes and looks to the ceiling.

These guys have had that dynamic since basically the early 90's. I wouldn't see it as any big deal.

Me thinks, with Axl being willing to let Slash back in the band, Axl is hoping for some of the old chemistry. Axl doesn't strike me as a guy that's willing to share a stage with someone he hates. Axl would be just fine with staying the fuck home. I still think they are actually friends again, no different than Axl's relationship with Izzy & Duff.