You are not logged in. Please register or login.

#651 Re: The Sunset Strip » Friends » 564 weeks ago

That's another thing too. I don't care how many people in my life tell me how absolutely gorgeous Jen Aniston is, I will NEVER EVER believe them.

Not only did I never find her attractive, I don't think she's pretty. At all.


Never got the thing. Believe it or not, if someone had a gun to my head I think Lisa Kudrow has aged the best of them all. Young Courtney Cox ("Family Ties"-era), was hot. Old "Scream 1-4" Courtney... pass.

#652 Re: The Garden » Donald Trump running for President » 564 weeks ago

Well and another theory has been that Trump was brought in to steal all of Rand Paul's supporters, and frankly... it worked. Trump is saying things Paul, as well as his father Ron, has been saying for years. Hilary/Dems/Establishment/Bilderbergers/Whoeverthefuck aren't scared in the least of Rubio, Bush, Christie, Fiorina (?), whatever getting elected because all of them are sellouts. Cruz is probably a sellout too because suddenly he's gotten a BIG push, and the irony of it all is he's basically a Hispanic Obama, with his whole Cuban immigrant story, when he had no identification with it, and up until the last year or two was a Canadian citizen and had been raised up there all of his life. Where's all the birthers asking for Cruz's birth certificate and questioning HIS dead beat father that didn't have anything to do with him up until the last ten years or so? Where are those Republican boot lickers?

Trump could just be a total mark.

I don't buy it though. Trump wouldn't be wasting his money on this otherwise. I think he's in it, but Trump like anyone else, Michael Moore, Obama, George W. Bush, are Provocateurs. They don't work on fear, they work on doubt and self-loathing. They provoke, and people evoke. And it works like a charm.

Trump is the "Axl card". He really could go either way. He could be the savior of America, or the death of the country for good. The guy is totally in it for himself, and basically is an American version of Vladimir Putin running for President.

I don't think that's a bad thing though. Putin, good or bad, is a natural-born leader, that isn't in it for any business, corporation, or government. He's in it FOR HIM. His ego. Trump is the same.

America hasn't had a leader like that for a very long time. It could be a great success that America needs or a total fucking disaster. That's part of the charm, but Trump knows how to play their game, and is shoving it back down their throats and it's driving them nuts. That i'm enjoying the hell out of watching. I get a laugh a day at least.

The rest are dark match jobbers. Paul & Cruz would probably make someone a decent VP, but nothing more. Sanders is a fucking loon, "Global Warming is the reason we have ISIS" ( 10 ). Hilary... I would vote for Satan himself before Hilary, less risk, let's put it that way.


And yes Obama's birth certificate was a hoax/hackjob. I didn't believe it at first, and thought it was neo-Con conspiracy, but when I looked into it... yes, everything about Obama was a total fucking work.

#653 Re: Guns N' Roses » Reunited GUNS N' ROSES To Play New T-Mobile Arena In Las Vegas » 564 weeks ago

Smoking Guns wrote:

AIC opened for VR during their 2007 US Tour.

Great point. Granted they were still rebuilding at that time, and didn't have any hit comeback songs out on the radio at the time like they did with Black Gives Way To Blue in 2009, and cuts like Check My Brain & Your Decision.


Granted VR did have Scott Weiland & Slash... but come on... if AIC will open for VR, they'll jump at the chance to open for the real GN'R.

#654 Re: Guns N' Roses » Reunited GUNS N' ROSES To Play New T-Mobile Arena In Las Vegas » 564 weeks ago

misterID wrote:
Neemo wrote:

I can't see SG or AIC in an opening slot either...this isn't 1991 anymore ... both bands are legendary now

And unlikely to be an act that could show them up

AIC isn't a huge draw anymore. Not without Layne. They've actually played as an opener before. I'm surprised they haven't opened for GNR before.

FlashFlood wrote:

AIC sells out 5-6k amphiteaters. I wouldn't be surprised if their last solo tour out drew Soundgarden's. Excluding their co-headline with NIN.


I love me some AIC & SG, but even those bands (interviews where Jerry, Sean & Chris Cornell) have alluded to the fact that GN'R were/are huge on a scale they never were and never will be. So much in fact that despite the faux hatred Seattle threw at them (when almost everyone was secretly a fan), couldn't understand why GN'R were given the gift all of those bands were starving for, and Axl couldn't seem to be less interested.

Regardless, AIC does good business, about the same as New GN'R, with GN'R having a slight edge. SG on the other hand, to my knowledge, there 'big reunion' has been almost purely artistic, because it hasn't resulted in ticket sales, nor album sales. SG is not Pearl Jam, and most people honestly don't know one single SG song past Black Hole goddamn Sun, and that's it. They might as well been one-hit wonders. AIC on the other hand has lived on better, despite the loss of Layne, by having many more instantly recognizable rock hits than SG, imo.

That's not to say SG aren't big and Chris Cornell a big name in rock, but to my knowledge they struggled to get promoter interest in a North American tour, and I thought linked up with NIN in order to help both bands tour.

AIC also has started to be more accepting to falling back on being a show opener for other artists, as opposed to being a headliner.


Neemo wrote:

I can't see SG or AIC in an opening slot either...this isn't 1991 anymore ... both bands are legendary now

And unlikely to be an act that could show them up


AIC & SG are by no way "Legendary". Iconic is a proper word to describe them. Metallica & GN'R are legendary.

Soundgarden... you might be right, they could probably crush GN'R on a good night. But then again, Cornell can be vocally spotty these days no different than Axl.

AIC, not a chance. I've really enjoyed their comeback, their my 2nd favorite band, but I still ain't on the DuVall-train (sorry Flood). DuVall has done a great job filling in, but I just... feel they could do better. What's Aaron Lewis doing these days? I'm sure he'd love the gig. I just feel AIC live, without Layne, has a massive hole, that could be filled by bringing someone in that does the material justice.

The problem I wonder is Jerry. Jerry now fully has control of this band with Layne's death, and no longer has to share the spotlight. If someone like an Aaron Lewis was there, Jerry might feel HE would get blown off the stage each night. Jerry has never struck me as egotistical, but still.

SG & PJ are locked in. AIC in the studio is locked in. I just feel they could do better by replacing DuVall. He's good, but they could be great again with the right guy.

Last time I heard Metallica, they had seen their better days. They had the same problem GN'R currently has. Talented band, with a touch & go frontman/singer.

#655 Re: The Sunset Strip » The Video Game Console Thread » 564 weeks ago

BLS-Pride wrote:

Just went back to The Witcher 3 and those developer's are amazing. All 12 DLCs were free. Only thing they charge for are the 2 expansion packs with add another 20 hours of game play.


Very cool. Wished Rockstar would do this. Or had've done this with GTA V.

#656 Re: The Sunset Strip » The Video Game Console Thread » 564 weeks ago

Me_Wise_Magic wrote:
Axlin16 wrote:

I completely agree on DLC's. Prices are just crazy, and you have to draw a line somewhere. I've recently been playing Batman: Arkham Knight (finally). I bought the sum bitch in early July (shortly after it was released), I bought it digital-download off of PSN, because I wanted to play it immediately. It cost me $59.99. I played the Poison Ivy capture deal (like the first thing), then got busy, and never picked it up again until Black Friday in November, I got a special deal + coupon where I bought the "Season Pass" for like $23 bucks off of PSN to get all the current DLC. I started over, played the Poison Ivy mission again... then got busy.

I started it AGAIN, and now i'm in it and like a quarter done. It's cool, it's great, the graphics rule, it's a nice sequel, Mark Hamill returns, but the Batmobile thing SUCKKKKKSSSSS.

But back to the DLC, there's alot of things to like about the "Season Pass" (I got screwed on the Arkham Origins one from a couple years ago), but at the same time... I just can't help... but to feel CHEATED.

All of this stuff is downloaded -- but locked. So it's already in the game. But then you have to pay for it. I payed $83 dollars (in total) for Batman: Arkham Knight... and I didn't even get a game disc. Nothing. If I would've bought the Premium Edition (Game + Season Pass), it would've cost $100 bucks. $100 Bucks!!! For a fucking video game?!?!

Am I old?

Now i'm probably going to Pre-Order "MLB: The Show 16--MVP Edition" for $69.99 (but i'll probably get 20% off). It's got all kinds of bonus stuff, but nothing earth-shattering. The best probably being a collectible Steelbook for American League MVP 3B Josh Donaldson of the Toronto Blue Jays, which looks really cool and I really want as an MLB & PS4 fan.

But there's another version... the "Digital Deluxe Edition" for $100 bucks... and it's ENTIRELY digital. $100 bucks?!?!? For a fucking baseball game that comes out every year with a roster update, no changes to uniforms, and it's $100 bucks? Madden does the exact same thing. So does Call of Duty.


I mean... you get to the point where you DRAW A LINE. $100 bucks is too fucking much for a video game, that in 6 months will be yesterday's news and available on Amazon for usually $25 bucks, if not less.


The greed, and locking people out of games is getting ridiculous.

You ain't the only one. Alot of gamers and customers in general have been getting screwed over by Warner Bros./WB Games for the past couple years now. Their DLC practices especially with the recent Mortal Kombat X and Arkham Knight are beyond shameful. Doesn't help their PR team are run by a bunch of assholes. WB Games also ported a unfinished, buggy version of Arkham Knight onto Steam and PC releases and it took fellow fans to patch their own game while WB did a bullshit apology, took the game off the Steam store, then brought it back weeks later, and still didn't fix everything. roll


Yeah the Arkham Origins Season Pass was a total fucking ripoff. I remember paying top dollar for that, because I adored Arkham Asylum & Arkham City, and I got hosed. Basically the Season Pass was $30 bucks, and all they gave us was some re-hashed Batman/Catwoman/Robin skins from Arkham City that practically looked ported-over, and they only released one story DLC that was very short, and basically took 6 months to come out, and that was it. It would've made more sense to just skip the Pass and buy the story DLC for $7 bucks later on. I did hear about the PC/Steam rollout on Arkham Knight and thought it was a joke. I knew there was tons of people looking forward MORE to the Steam version than the console. I think the biggest thing that burned people's asses about the Steam deal was that THEY KNEW that game was FUBAR'ED. And yet... they still released it. They still took people's money. Knowing how f'ed it was. And honestly, had all of the gaming sites not called them out on it and made it very public and very embarrassing, they would've just skipped along squashing all the dissenters. "It's a dirty game" ... indeed.

The Arkham Knight DLC has been handled alot better than Origins, but I think people (myself included) feel that when you're paying $30 extra bucks, you should be getting MULTIPLE story DLC's that last hours and hours each.

Same thing with MLB. I was gonna skip it this year, but I like the Blue Jays steelbook, and they're gonna finally have Closed Roofs on the Retractable Roof stadiums. Seems like a stupid, trivial thing, but i've been SCREAMING for it and the game to be accurate with it for the better part of a DECADE (not kidding). So i'm gonna support them FINALLY doing it.

It's a great game, don't get me wrong, but that Digital Deluxe Edition for $100 bucks is just crazy. Their definition of 'added value' and mine are just -- different. They think "imaginary money" (think GTA V) and digital baseball cards are worth $30 bucks. When I pay $30 extra bucks, the equivalent of a Season Pass, i'm expecting Bonus Uniforms, whole Classic Stadiums to play the game in, Legendary players, etc. You know -- stuff. Not "points" and digital cards. $10 bucks extra for that -- great -- $30?!?!? Whoa bro.


I see these Call of Duty packs that are up there at like $149 dollars, and they'll be right back next year with the same thing... and I always think... no one a grown ass adult is buying this for themselves. This has GOT to be some 14 year old dork with mommy's credit card buying this shit.

#657 Re: The Sunset Strip » Friends » 564 weeks ago

Friends was something I think appealed to people in major urban areas. I knew NO ONE that watched the show when I was younger, but knew of many that were on the Seinfeld, Raymond, Two and a Half Men-train (only with Sheen, not Kutcher). Same thing with Cheers. Knew alot of Cheers fans, but most of them hated Frasier.

But if certain people aren't coming back for it... why do it?

Perry probably doesn't want to be apart of it, because he spent YEARS in CRAPPY tv shows trying to shed his Friends-skin, and then he finally gets a hit with that guy off of Reno 911, in a remake/reboot of "The Odd Couple" TV series, and suddenly Perry's finally starring in a TV hit, and now is when they want him to do a Friends reunion.

More than likely all of this is coming about because Courtney Cox & Lisa Kudrow's shows got cancelled and Jen Aniston's film career has stalled. Schwimmer and Joey (whatever his name is) are probably begging for it too.

#658 Re: Guns N' Roses » Looks like rehearsals have started! » 564 weeks ago

misterID wrote:
Smoking Guns wrote:

Folks on MyGNR in the Coachella thread claim first weekend is in danger due to the drummer situation not being solved. Many saying it is bullshit but Teejay and one other heard Matt was told by Duff and Slash he would have involvement and Adler has some kind of an incentive and are trying to get the language right. Basically some think the Band still isn't determined, which we too have wondered. So Axl wants Frank obviously. Slash and Duff want Matt and Steven involved.

I think GNR plays both weekends, but I think some feelings are about to be getting hurt sooner rather than later.

Hmmm, that's different from what I hear. Matt isn't in any way a deal breaker, but Steven could be in line for something. I think the band line up is pretty solid.

I agree the band lineup they have now is solid, but not to beat this into the ground... but like everyone else, all i'm hearing is Frank IS IN. Frank is the guy. I've heard no wavering from that, and that more than likely they're negotiating how the others will guest appear.


Then again... what if....


What if....



What if ALL THREE were hired? Crazy right? Steven plays AFD, we say bye, then Matt's brought out for UYI, we say bye, then Frank's brought out for CD and new songs. Hmmm...

#659 Re: Guns N' Roses » Looks like rehearsals have started! » 564 weeks ago

I don't buy any of this, including Axl's preference of Frank. If Axl is willing to show Tommy fucking Stinson the door, with ease, for Duff McKagan, then he would have no problem showing the door to Frank, if necessary. I mean I think Frank's the best, but come on, this is a reunion we're talking about.


I think the hangup, IF they are working on a tour might be insurance problems. Steven probably wants ALL IN on this reunion, and the thing is Slash is best friends with the guy, and there has to be concerns about not only Steven's addiction, but also his ability to even play the tracks, AND what his mental health will be if he doesn't get the gig. Matt probably wants in, and is a FAR MORE RELIABLE option that the fans would love to have (even though the diehards want either Steven or Frank, depending on the camp), and then there's Frank, who's the safest option, but going to cause fallout in other camps, but also has logged nearly 10 years in the band.

Ultimately they're all probably still working out the logistics of how this is going to work, money, the fact that even if Steven and/or Matt are involved, they're not getting Izzy's cut, let alone Axl/Slash/Duff.


Personally, IF they really intend this to be a reunion, there's still a part of me that would be curious if Axl would play it safe (with Frank), or take a real chance with a Steven/Matt combo. If it does happen, ballsy, and congrats to Slash & Duff for sticking to it, because if Steven & Matt are apart of this, I think this is solely by Slash & Duff's involvement.

#660 Re: Guns N' Roses » Reunited GUNS N' ROSES To Play New T-Mobile Arena In Las Vegas » 564 weeks ago

I would love SG as well, but I don't know if it's a big enough ticket. In a scenario like that, SG would just be considered an higher-end opener. Tack on Alice In Chains to the ticket... AIC / SG / GN'R -- that's a comparable ticket to "Metallica" / GN'R.

I'd actually argue the only other big name out there on that level left from GNR's heyday, is Metallica, and frankly it'd probably be smart if they made friends again, because BOTH could use each other right now for their brands. Ironically, maybe Metallica needs GN'R more, at this second.

I don't see GN'R touring with Bon Jovi anytime soon.

Board footer

Powered by FluxBB