You are not logged in. Please register or login.

mitchejw
 Rep: 130 

Re: US Politics Thread

mitchejw wrote:
Randall Flagg wrote:
mitchejw wrote:
Smoking Guns wrote:

Then why did he repeatedly try to influence the investigation?


Who told you that?  More retracted articles from CNN or The NY Times?  Trump had nothing to do with Russia. Comey said Trump was never under investigation. What more do you need?

Comey's own testimony says Trump wanted answers to Russia. The only "scandal" you have is that Trump said he hoped Comey let Flynn go. Flynn, who Comey also said wasn't fundamental to the Russian investigation. So all of your hoopla (despite SLC and ID lying) about Flynn flipping on Trump, was complete bullshit.

Do you understand why Trump was upset?  He had the media and people like you repeatedly telling lies for partisan purposes. You have members of this forum posting about how confident than are about Piss Tapes existing, despite the intelligence community calling the dossier bunk and Obama dismissing it outright, even questioning why the intel community would waste his time briefing him on these salacious accusations.  Don't you find it a tad ironic that the only people who believe this outrageous stuff are the same people who loathe Trump. 

Meanwhile, Clinton was under investigation, and the same AG who met secretly with her husband directed Comey not to call it an investigation.

Added in with the Podesta leaks showing collusion with the media and DNC, at what point will you accept the only crooks in the election were the Democrats.

You missed a lot of testimony sir...

You are the most partisan person here.

Smoking Guns
 Rep: 330 

Re: US Politics Thread

Smoking Guns wrote:

It was pretty significant that Matthews has given up on the collusion etc.

Randall Flagg
 Rep: 139 

Re: US Politics Thread

mitchejw wrote:
Randall Flagg wrote:
mitchejw wrote:

Then why did he repeatedly try to influence the investigation?


Who told you that?  More retracted articles from CNN or The NY Times?  Trump had nothing to do with Russia. Comey said Trump was never under investigation. What more do you need?

Comey's own testimony says Trump wanted answers to Russia. The only "scandal" you have is that Trump said he hoped Comey let Flynn go. Flynn, who Comey also said wasn't fundamental to the Russian investigation. So all of your hoopla (despite SLC and ID lying) about Flynn flipping on Trump, was complete bullshit.

Do you understand why Trump was upset?  He had the media and people like you repeatedly telling lies for partisan purposes. You have members of this forum posting about how confident than are about Piss Tapes existing, despite the intelligence community calling the dossier bunk and Obama dismissing it outright, even questioning why the intel community would waste his time briefing him on these salacious accusations.  Don't you find it a tad ironic that the only people who believe this outrageous stuff are the same people who loathe Trump. 

Meanwhile, Clinton was under investigation, and the same AG who met secretly with her husband directed Comey not to call it an investigation.

Added in with the Podesta leaks showing collusion with the media and DNC, at what point will you accept the only crooks in the election were the Democrats.

You missed a lot of testimony sir...

You are the most partisan person here.


I'm one of the few people here who didn't swear on a bible some illegal event happened or that Trump was under investigation and now have been proven objectively wrong.

mitchejw
 Rep: 130 

Re: US Politics Thread

mitchejw wrote:
Randall Flagg wrote:
mitchejw wrote:
Randall Flagg wrote:

Who told you that?  More retracted articles from CNN or The NY Times?  Trump had nothing to do with Russia. Comey said Trump was never under investigation. What more do you need?

Comey's own testimony says Trump wanted answers to Russia. The only "scandal" you have is that Trump said he hoped Comey let Flynn go. Flynn, who Comey also said wasn't fundamental to the Russian investigation. So all of your hoopla (despite SLC and ID lying) about Flynn flipping on Trump, was complete bullshit.

Do you understand why Trump was upset?  He had the media and people like you repeatedly telling lies for partisan purposes. You have members of this forum posting about how confident than are about Piss Tapes existing, despite the intelligence community calling the dossier bunk and Obama dismissing it outright, even questioning why the intel community would waste his time briefing him on these salacious accusations.  Don't you find it a tad ironic that the only people who believe this outrageous stuff are the same people who loathe Trump. 

Meanwhile, Clinton was under investigation, and the same AG who met secretly with her husband directed Comey not to call it an investigation.

Added in with the Podesta leaks showing collusion with the media and DNC, at what point will you accept the only crooks in the election were the Democrats.

You missed a lot of testimony sir...

You are the most partisan person here.


I'm one of the few people here who didn't swear on a bible some illegal event happened or that Trump was under investigation and now have been proven objectively wrong.

Do you work for the trump administration?

mitchejw
 Rep: 130 

Re: US Politics Thread

mitchejw wrote:

https://www.yahoo.com/news/iran-supreme … 43723.html

This sure doesn't fit the narrative does it ?

misterID
 Rep: 475 

Re: US Politics Thread

misterID wrote:
Smoking Guns wrote:

It was pretty significant that Matthews has given up on the collusion etc.

So now you like Matthews? 16

Comey never said what he disputed in that article and refused to talk about campaign collusion because of sensitive Intel and ongoing investiations. The problem he's in, personally, is a possible cover up....like what we've been saying. He probably hasn't done anything illegal himself, the president has a lot of immunity, but his behavior in the aftermath of whatever happened has been inconceivably stupid and reckless.

It's amazing his supporters are hailing this part of Comey's testimony but totally ignoring the part about being a dishonest, unscrupulous liar.

misterID
 Rep: 475 

Re: US Politics Thread

misterID wrote:
Randall Flagg wrote:
mitchejw wrote:
Randall Flagg wrote:

Who told you that?  More retracted articles from CNN or The NY Times?  Trump had nothing to do with Russia. Comey said Trump was never under investigation. What more do you need?

Comey's own testimony says Trump wanted answers to Russia. The only "scandal" you have is that Trump said he hoped Comey let Flynn go. Flynn, who Comey also said wasn't fundamental to the Russian investigation. So all of your hoopla (despite SLC and ID lying) about Flynn flipping on Trump, was complete bullshit.

Do you understand why Trump was upset?  He had the media and people like you repeatedly telling lies for partisan purposes. You have members of this forum posting about how confident than are about Piss Tapes existing, despite the intelligence community calling the dossier bunk and Obama dismissing it outright, even questioning why the intel community would waste his time briefing him on these salacious accusations.  Don't you find it a tad ironic that the only people who believe this outrageous stuff are the same people who loathe Trump. 

Meanwhile, Clinton was under investigation, and the same AG who met secretly with her husband directed Comey not to call it an investigation.

Added in with the Podesta leaks showing collusion with the media and DNC, at what point will you accept the only crooks in the election were the Democrats.

You missed a lot of testimony sir...

You are the most partisan person here.


I'm one of the few people here who didn't swear on a bible some illegal event happened or that Trump was under investigation and now have been proven objectively wrong.

Uh, no. No to all of that. Completely false.

Randall Flagg
 Rep: 139 

Re: US Politics Thread

misterID wrote:
Randall Flagg wrote:
mitchejw wrote:

You missed a lot of testimony sir...

You are the most partisan person here.


I'm one of the few people here who didn't swear on a bible some illegal event happened or that Trump was under investigation and now have been proven objectively wrong.

Uh, no. No to all of that. Completely false.


Dude, everything you've said has been proven wrong or you lack any evidence. The media has already moved on from collusion. You should too.

No amount of denial or lies will change you and others ranting about investigations and collusions. Comey debunked The NY Times article saying their was no truth to it. Trump was never under investigation. Flynn's investigation had nothing to do with colluding with Russia to hack the election.

Move on.

Lynch didn't recuse herself until after she was caught with Clinton. Lynch told Comey not to call it an investigation. Obama went on TV and said Hillary did nothing illegal well before the investigation was concluded. A memo alleges Lynch told Clinton she'd handle it. 3/4 of these are indisputable. And no congressional inquiry was launched. No FBI investigation.

Sessions recused himself almost immediately. Republicans are supporting thorough investigations to find the truth. Trump didn't invoke executive privledge like Obama did to protect Holder.  A special investigator/prosecutor has been appointed to really get the grasp of what Russia did. Yet your party still refused to turn over their hacked servers and your President did nothing, not even telling the American public.

I'm sorry, but the Republicans are being more transparent and thorough than any of Obama's scandals that the media glanced over or ignored to control the national debate. 93% coverage and all negative on Trump from these networks. And you're falling for it hook, line and sinker.

You belong to a party of thieves and manipulators who demand Comey be fired on Monday and cry foul after he's fired on Tuesday.

You have no intellectual integrity and continue to bloviate with shit sources that are now being retracted. Get over yourself.

Trump didn't obstruct justice. Trump won't be impeached. And you'll still be posting nonsense, only to deny doing so months later.

Not a single thing you've argued has proven true. Yet the crux of your entire argument until you jumped on the obstruction train has fallen apart.

Take a look in the mirror. You're smarter than this and allowing your hatred of an idiot cloud your judgement.

misterID
 Rep: 475 

Re: US Politics Thread

misterID wrote:

If he was cleared, what were the findings of the official investigations, Flagg, and please show me where I can find those official findings, thanks.

Oh, you can't, because nothing has been proved anything yet? Oh. Guess that's because the investigations are not done yet. And Comey's testimony was pretty damning on his ethics. You can wish it away and say it all you want, but they're not cleared. Republicans are under investigation here, plus they tried to sandbag the investigations, refused to bring in an independent investigations and tried to defund and dismantle the ethics commission... That's being transparent?

So, instead of making things up, stop lying, stop talking about idiot clouds, and realize he has not been cleared of obstruction. He has not been cleared. Period. Stop lying. smile

Randall Flagg
 Rep: 139 

Re: US Politics Thread

What investigation?  The one Comey said never started on Trump? Or are we now pretending you never claimed Trump was under investigation?  Orwell had no idea people like you would take 1984 seriously as a way to live.

Board footer

Powered by FluxBB