Board footer

bringbackadler in 2008

 Rep: 1 

Re: New OMG Leak ? [False]

bringbackadler in 2008 wrote:

I'm not sure if this has been posted here or not. If it has, I didn't see where.

I found this on another forum. It's like a 10-15 second leak of OMG supposedly from around 2002. Normally, I'm a skeptic when it comes to these supposed new leaks, but the vocals do sound somewhat raspier than the 99 studio.

Anyone else thinking so ? 

http://www.sendspace.com/file/dclgda

bba 08'

AtariLegend

Re: New OMG Leak ? [False]

AtariLegend wrote:

Same music, same vocals, slightly better bit-rate.

Thus fake.

bringbackadler in 2008

 Rep: 1 

Re: New OMG Leak ? [False]

bringbackadler in 2008 wrote:

Same music, same vocals, slightly better bit-rate.

Thus fake.

Well, if it is just the bit rate, it still makes Axl sound better than the shit he sounded like in that 99 studio version.

Please don't give me negative karma for being wrong, Atari. 

bba 08'

DoubleTalkingJive

 Rep: 74 

Re: New OMG Leak ? [False]

DoubleTalkingJive wrote:

Definitely sounds the like a tweaked version of the same.

Sky Dog

Re: New OMG Leak ? [False]

Sky Dog wrote:

It's alive! It's alive! Run for the hills......

tejastech08

 Rep: 194 

Re: New OMG Leak ? [False]

tejastech08 wrote:

Still a shitty song.

RussTCB

 Rep: 633 

Re: New OMG Leak ? [False]

RussTCB wrote:

removed

Dadud

 Rep: 14 

Re: New OMG Leak ? [False]

Dadud wrote:

i bet you any money someone edited OMG, tried the "Ill trade you this leak for that leak" thing, and botched it.

James

 Rep: 664 

Re: New OMG Leak ? [False]

James wrote:

Yeah, extremely fake. Like Dadud said, was likely made for trade bait, which is laughable. A hoarder isn't gonna want that, and if they do, they're not gonna be interested in a tiny clip of it. Its not like we've never heard it before.

BurningHills

 Rep: 15 

Re: New OMG Leak ? [False]

BurningHills wrote:

Sounds like it was pitch shifted down in an audio editor. Fake.