You are not logged in. Please register or login.
- Topics: Active | Unanswered
Re: We don't really expect a new setlist do we?
I’ve lost so much respect for the band. Part of going to a gig for me is some element of surprise about what songs the performer will play. How many times can someone sit through easy, brownstone and jungle. Time to massively shake it up! That’s why I can’t part with however much they are asking for a ticket these days
- Cerulean wind
- Rep: -6
Re: We don't really expect a new setlist do we?
JULY 30TH: (SOUNDCHECK)
1 - Instrumental Jam NEW SONG
2 - Welcome To The Jungle
3 - Slither
4 - Coma
5 - Locomotive
6 - Out Ta Get Me
7 - My Michelle
8 - Black Hole Sun [Duff McKagan on lead vocals] (Soundgarden cover)
9 - Patience
10 - Rocket Queen
11 - Civil War [Less than a minute]
12 - Catcher In The Rye
13 - Sorry
14 - Madagascar
15 - Prostitute
16 - There Was A Time
17 - HARD SCHOOL
18 - MACHINE GUN (Hendrix cover)
19 - Used To Love Her
20 - The Seeker (The Who cover)
21 - Paradise City
Security guards kicking fans out of the venue. Security did not allow recordings.
From an insider on FB and MyGnR.
__________________________________
GUNS N' ROSES - HARD SCHOOL (2021 - without Axl Rose):
Christ!! I love this new version! It's so Guns N' Roses! Beats the 2000 recording by a country mile.
- davegnfnr2k
- Rep: 1
Re: We don't really expect a new setlist do we?
they totally butched the song and took out all the good guitars.
- Cerulean wind
- Rep: -6
Re: We don't really expect a new setlist do we?
EDIT:
#1 might be "Bennie & The Jets" (Elton John cover).
No signals of a ZZ Top cover... so far.
- AgesOfTheIce
- Rep: 10
Re: We don't really expect a new setlist do we?
You people are on crack. No one's more of a CD era purist than me and I'd rather have Zodiac, Soul Monster & Berlin in their original forms than this, but the original Hardschool demo is pure uninspired nonsense. Boring intro, solos that don't fit, ect. Slash gives it a more UYI feel and gives the song a rawer, meaner feel. This is a huge improvement.
Re: We don't really expect a new setlist do we?
I just heard it once. Yeah it's different but I don't have a problem with it. I can take it or leave it...but that's beside the point.
They've clearly worked on CD era tracks. This is going beyond reworking 13 year old released tracks.
This is technically a new song....and 99.9% of the audience has no idea it exists.
If it's becoming a staple in the set list, it's the first sign in five years that something might be on the horizon.
- Haters Gonna Hate
- Rep: 1
Re: We don't really expect a new setlist do we?
only 8 more years for a new album now. thank u axl by take care of us
- jimmythegent
- Rep: 30
Re: We don't really expect a new setlist do we?
sounds killer! it's as good as I could imagine this lineup doing it. If all we are getting regarding new material is reworked CD leftovers in this vein, then that will suffice as long as the material is strong - bring it on! Just hope they actually play it in the set...
Re: We don't really expect a new setlist do we?
If it's becoming a staple in the set list, it's the first sign in five years that something might be on the horizon.
Been saying this repeatedly. Seen some negative fans complaining about the changes or saying they don't want to hear it if Axl sounds bad.
How good this is isn't the point. They could play Silkworms II and it could be the worst thing we've ever heard - would still be a positive.
Like you say, a sign of things actually progressing.
