You are not logged in. Please register or login.

buzzsaw
 Rep: 423 

Re: Mickey Rourke Golden Globes

buzzsaw wrote:

I know nothing about the movie (nor do I care), but is it possible they used the re-recorded version?  If so, I'm guessing those guys would still have to sign off on it (which probably means it was the original)?  Just thinking outloud...

RussTCB
 Rep: 633 

Re: Mickey Rourke Golden Globes

RussTCB wrote:

removed

Axlin16
 Rep: 768 

Re: Mickey Rourke Golden Globes

Axlin16 wrote:

I'm still curious why in the hell Ratt were credited as 'Rat Attack'.


WTF?

Smoking Guns
 Rep: 330 

Re: Mickey Rourke Golden Globes

Smoking Guns wrote:
madagas wrote:

come on....he knows the details.......we don't. A  movie with no budget knows how and why they got what they get. However, that doesn't mean Slash/Duff/Izzy/Adler weren't needed to sign off on it. Again, we don't know the details of their publishing relationship. And, again, your bias to Slash and the other guys is what I talked about in my prior post. You don't know what your talking about yet you tend to immediately side with an anti Axl stance. You just assume that because Mickey only gave a shout out to Axl that Mickey was some how wrong or misinformed. Too funny...

Micky also has Slash on the soundtrack..... HMMMMMMMMMMMMMM

Neemo
 Rep: 485 

Re: Mickey Rourke Golden Globes

Neemo wrote:

i added this movie to the discography

2u7q9mu.jpg

^thats a linked image wink

Board footer

Powered by FluxBB