You are not logged in. Please register or login.

#101 Re: Guns N' Roses » Radio Reacts To Guns N' Roses Single » 880 weeks ago

GNRBABY wrote:

The album is going to be a huge success. It will sell millions world wide. It's pretty safe to assume it will go gold and platinum in lots of areas...



GNR is back

you're far too positive, buzzaw will deal with your accordingly

#102 Re: Guns N' Roses » Radio Reacts To Guns N' Roses Single » 880 weeks ago

-Jack- wrote:

Chinese Democracy is again number #3 on KROQ 106.7's furious 5 at 9. smile. Sounds like people like it. I agree it may not be the best song, but I don't think there's denying that people dig it.

i am sorry jack, you were lied to, the law of averages suggests that and thats science.

#103 Re: Guns N' Roses » Radio Reacts To Guns N' Roses Single » 880 weeks ago

NO YOU DONT YOU ARE LYING! DONT MAKE ME WRITE ANOTHER ESSAY, your opinion is invalid and you speak lies with two tongues.

#104 Re: Guns N' Roses » Radio Reacts To Guns N' Roses Single » 880 weeks ago

look guys, i know what you're thinking, you're thinking you like the new guns n roses single, you're thinking great its getting all kinds of airplay, the albums finally on its way its time to celebrate right? WRONG! you're all pathetic fanboys!
you see the law of averages states that everyone hates GNR, whilst everyone loves slash, now if you feel differently you're just being delusional, because you're stating your opinion as fact. i asked my friend if he liked the new single and HE TOOK MY Mp3 PLAYER FROM ME AND SMASHED IT TO BITS HE THOUGHT IT WAS THAT BAD!and then a group of music critics who were walking by assaulted me because i dared speak the words chinese democracy, you see guys EVERYONE HATES IT AND SO WILL YOU ONCE I AM DONE WITH YOU, you people being all positive and happy aren't providing any first hand accounts, however what i just said was real occurrence and as stated by the law of gravity the single will and despised by all, every single positive review you post is edited, that or you wrote it yourself.

now let me get to my second point. russ you're wrong, the single should be number 1 everywhere any less and well you guys clearly owe me some money.

all i am saying is we're the only ones that care, never mind the 1000+ news articles about the release, they were fabricated. what i am trying to tell you is the song, and everyone who likes the song is an illiterate idiot, and thats fact, the law of averages says so, you can try and argue but i got all week motherbitch, i got star wars playen, i got my popcorn bitch and i do not need no sunshine babey!


there buzzsaw, now you never ever have to post again and nor do i.

#105 Re: Guns N' Roses » Radio Reacts To Guns N' Roses Single » 880 weeks ago

why dont your cry about it buzz, just like you cry about everything else, go wallow in our pathetic self pity.

"oh boohoo, i am starwars fan, everyone you have hate the new single because i do oh boohoo, i am 27 and still a virgin oh boofuckinhoo aniken sky walker rocks my world, i want everyone to be as miserable as me"

thats what you write every type you post, but you coat with a 3000 word essay each time, but i can read between the lines.

#106 Re: Guns N' Roses » Radio Reacts To Guns N' Roses Single » 880 weeks ago

buzzsaw wrote:

If those numbers are accurate, it's lower than I would have thought.  Of course, I don't think it was on the whole week either.  Week 2 will be interesting...

russ, it's not an insult, though you're free to take it however you want.  Think it through logically...the law of averages says I'm right, unless you only asked a couple people.  There's nothing that everybody likes or dislikes, so I'm not sure why that's so offensive to you.

what the fuck are you talking about, what law of average, ahh you're such a pathetic cunt.
dont take it as an insult though buzz man, the law of average say i am right.

#107 Re: Guns N' Roses » Changes to the tracks you'd like to see: » 881 weeks ago

-Jack- wrote:

Yeah hopefully we can hear a review from him and hopefully, if he chooses to leak it, he will leak it in a high quality lossless format instead of mp3...

I wouldn't mind a leak of the album at this point. big_smile

how incredibly selfish

#108 Re: Guns N' Roses » Changes to the tracks you'd like to see: » 881 weeks ago

yea so me and jimy, we be in chillen in cd.com chat and who should come along mr saint lauren. anyway we didnt think starting a new thread was necessary but he says he has the album, 'dont try to stop us now'=scraped, song 2=prostitute, besides complaining of a headache and then going to sleep thats all he told us, oh he did offer to play a clip over the phone of the new maddy. he also seemed apprehensive about leaking it, hopefully he doesnt.

#109 Re: Guns N' Roses » Changes to the tracks you'd like to see: » 881 weeks ago

James Lofton wrote:

Silkworms would have been better than Shacklers.

or checkmate/no love remains....alas we can dream /sigh

#110 Re: Guns N' Roses » Changes to the tracks you'd like to see: » 881 weeks ago

am i the only one who thinks shackler's revenge needs to be removed from the album all together? it is not cohesive with any of the other tracks, and stands out like a sore thumb. alone, as one off promotional tool in rockband the song is fine, but the sound is far too harsh and industrial compared with the rest of the album.

Board footer

Powered by FluxBB