You are not logged in. Please register or login.
- Topics: Active | Unanswered
#1171 Re: The Sunset Strip » New Pearl Jam coming soon » 701 weeks ago
I've felt this way since the late 90's. I actually walked away from the band for many many years, so much to the point I didn't know much of them past Ten and some singles.
Truthfully, they've been a singles band since about No Code. Sure they always have a few good tracks per record, but I truely miss the Pearl Jam of their early years.
With Soundgarden back in form, Chains souped up and reminded the world who they are.... it'd be nice if the Seattle trifecta was complete and Pearl Jam released like "Ten.5" or something like that. Something that harkens back to their early days.
#1172 Re: The Sunset Strip » Alice In Chains » 701 weeks ago
I gotta admit, like King Animal, i've been listening to this over and over, and it's starting to feel more and more like the grower we all originally predicted. Even some of the tracks I said before are starting to change for me, like Low Ceiling. Suddenly they seem even better than before.
Sure there are immediate grabs, and still a couple of weaker ones, but like KA it's an album for fans and it's a slow burn. Suddenly alot of the stuff seems more defined than it was before.
#1173 Re: The Sunset Strip » STONE TEMPLE PILOTS return with CHESTER BENNINGTON as their FRONTMAN! » 701 weeks ago
I gotta admit, for the first time Weiland looks like he has a legit suit here. Those statements above, as well as the compensatory damages he is seeking is not out of spite, but what he feels he is owed and he wants it publicly out there that he is STP and that they are wrong.
I think the guy is in the right.
#1174 Re: The Sunset Strip » Most Recent Movie You've Seen » 701 weeks ago
Saw Fast 6 the other day. A fun action film. Nothing more. I enjoyed it with my bro. Don't know why they need to make so many besides each film making good profit at the box office.
The biggest reason is they get better and better. Fast Five was the best one they ever did. I personally thought 3 & 4 were pieces of turd. Tokyo Drift, ugh no, and Fast 4 was not the glorious "return" film I thought it'd be. I think the story was loaded with holes, and it was too gimmicky, relying on returning stars Diesel, Walker & Brewster to drive the interest in the film.
I loved the 2nd film, and thought it was the best of the bunch, until 5. I always thought the 1st was overrated personally. A good-to-average action film at best, but okay.
Haven't seen 6, but they definitely have caught a second-wind in this franchise with a more adult buddy-cop dynamic. The Fast & The Furious films have survived Tokyo Drift to become the "Lethal Weapon" franchise of their day.
I do think they need to start looking for their end with the films though. They played out the race car driving thing and converted it to heist films. Even with heist films, there's only so many stories there to do that.
Universal knows after Tokyo Drift, that people do NOT see these as a concept-action franchise. They go for Diesel & Walker in the same film, no different than Gibson & Glover. Furious Six is on track to earn MORE money than Fast Five. They keep earning that much, Uni will want to just keep making them until someone says no.
Eventually I think they're gonna have to get to a "Lethal Weapon 4" moment where everyone just says 'enough', and they give it a finality and a closure, and walk away on top.
#1175 Re: Guns N' Roses » House of Blues Houston, TX - May 28th 2013 » 701 weeks ago
buzzsaw wrote:That's a pipe dream. There's no way in the world that freak show from 2002 was ever going to be accepted as GnR. That was over as soon as the VMAs happened.
2002 band was amazing they take massive shit on current incamation.
And that's fine if musically that's your opinion.
In reality the current fans have this revisionist history thinking the 2002 band was gonna save the world.
I remember the day after the VMA's, and GN'R were the talk of the radio & TV.
NONE
N-O-N-E
Of it was good. They were slammed unmercifully, Axl was called fat & washed up. He was compared to being a lost Kid Rock knock off (which is a HUGE slam). Everyone wanted to know where Guns N' Roses were. Eyewitnesses at the show were saying how the audience seemed confused, expecting to see Slash & Izzy & Duff, and didn't recognize anyone, Axl included. Most slammed his voice as shit, the new song in the medley ("Madagascar") was slammed as a piece of shit, and so on and so on.
There's a reason when in 2006 when John Norris asked him about that performance, Axl described it in one word -- "castastrophe".
That singular appearence, with that band, that circus, buried Axl's reboot dream for Guns N' Roses in a mere 9 minutes. Even Axl knew it.
Axl sorely under-estimated image. Regardless of Slash. If the current band had been the ones there instead, playing an "If I Die Tomorrow" song, it might've been a different story. But all of that is could've, would've, should've.
In reality with Axl's voice in the condition it was in 2002... Axl should've been nowhere but at his house. NO ONE was ever prepared to accept Mickey Mouse-Axl as Axl Rose. 2006 was the moment.
#1176 Re: Guns N' Roses » Axl Rose, Kelsey Grammer, Vanessa Hudgens Party at Hakkasan Las Vegas » 701 weeks ago
Axlin12 wrote:Axl looks terrible. Duff 1993 horrendous.
See his fingers? That's edema folks. Axl's got a drinking problem something fierce.
It could be edema, but there are other root causes for edema than liver-related issues.
Ali
True, he did mention he had blood pressure issues in the past.
But more than likely it's booze. We all know since he re-emerged in 2009, he's been hitting alcohol harder and more blatantly. Granted I do remember a show in 2006 (might've been Rio: Lisbon) where he drank champagne throughout the show.
Seems like he's getting to Duff '93 territory. Everytime you see him now, he's drinking. That bloat, that's drinking bloat. Seen many of family and friends go down that path, and they all have had the identical look Axl has right now.
#1177 Re: The Sunset Strip » Alice In Chains » 701 weeks ago
wow lots to think about in that review.
Will post more later is nearly 4am here now.
"If you loved Black Gives Way To Blue. You WILL LIKE this record. But because you like BGWTB, you WILL NOT love this record for the same reasons" - strongly agree with that.
To me it's like a sequel/companion piece to that record...so if you like one you'll like both, but I think the first one has a lot strong songs in terms of immediate hooks - like "Check My Brain" or "Lesson Learned" are absurdly catchy in a way this album isn't - although I am really liking this album - but it's much more of a slow burn than immediate hook record.
Curious to me that you don't like Stone though - it's my fav at the moment - I took the lyrics to be about a guy who isn't "emotionally available" so to speak.
Stone, might be a grower. I dunno. I definitely can see your take on the lyrics, but I felt it was a slag on the media because of the whole "cut me" stuff in it.
I can definitely say Lab Monkey is a grower. The other day I was listening to it, in storming rain, and it just hit me like a ton of bricks. Might be the best song on the album. Real sludgy.
#1178 Re: Guns N' Roses » House of Blues Houston, TX - May 28th 2013 » 701 weeks ago
Completely agree Furbush. People complain about the suck constantly, but as long as they shell out money, they'll continue to have 70% Axl with session musicians forever. Good job, you accomplished nothing.
Axl wants to wake up and record new music and stop being a pussy living off other people's legacy, including his former self, fine i'll give him 100% support, but until then... whatever.
I'd rather listen to a Jerry Cantrell solo record called Alice in Chains where they at least TRIED to do something cool and new. Mad respect for that. Even Aerosmith.
GN'R? What GN'R? You mean that band that died in Buenos Aires in 1993?
#1179 Re: Guns N' Roses » The "Fookin' June Already?!" Evo Song of the Week Poll » 701 weeks ago
Estranged (instrumental)
I can see in the 2 months i've been gone, you people still haven't gotten it right. 
#1180 Re: Guns N' Roses » River City Rock Fest - San Antonio, Texas May 26, 2013 » 701 weeks ago
Alright you guys. I have my review. I want to preface and say that its probably going to be biased, but I'm going to try really hard to give you an honest opinion.
Before that, I want to say something. I know we here on the boards and as fans have heard the same setlist and songs for what seems like forever. Hell, last night I realized I've seen GN'R since 2002. Many of you here probably go as far back as the 80s or 90s. So by now the songs are probably tired, and old. But honestly? There's four albums worth of material. FOUR. That's not a very large catalog of music to pick from. Yeah, I remember seeing them before CD was even a rumor, when they busted out with Better and Street of Dreams. Sure sometime I wish he'd sing something no one has heard before. But, I've been to shows where people have sang along with the CD songs, and I've been to shows where the crowd is quiet save for those few die hards that know those songs. There's still people out there who haven't heard the CD songs, there were people there last night who have NEVER seen GN'R in concert. So for us as diehard fans, its the same old same old.
That being said, what I saw last night was Axl Rose having fun. He was smiling, he was genuine when he thanked the fans in between songs. You could see that he truly appreciated the crowd. At least that's how I saw it. He even slipped at one point, and just kept right on going. He nailed Jungle. He needs to stay away from Estranged. He was pretty reserved most of the night as far as not running back and forth across the stage. His voice does come and go. Some songs he's got it, and others...its tough. But at the end of the day, I am just truly grateful that he shows up, and that he still puts forth the effort.
So, take it for what its worth.
Glad you had fun girl. I know it's been awhile for you seeing Guns. Good to see you here again.
