You are not logged in. Please register or login.

#17581 Re: Guns N' Roses » update on MSL's site » 946 weeks ago

Jarmo "sold out"


MSL is just withholding something he knows, because it would create a shitstorm for him to talk.


What exactly THAT is... is anyone's guess.

#17582 Re: Guns N' Roses » Information on Shackler's Revenge » 946 weeks ago

Yep. But Axl had no faith in his own material.

#17583 Re: Guns N' Roses » Democracy not eligible for Billboard 200? » 946 weeks ago

No physical release?


Get ready for lawsuits Axl.

#17584 Re: Guns N' Roses » Stinson bailed? NME rumor. » 946 weeks ago

Considering the fact that the NEW BAND, typically only plays 4 new songs during a show...

There's not a chance in hell they'd play new songs during a reunion show, unless it was totally fresh material being worked for a fourth album.

Considering the fact that all Axl plays is the old catalog, there's not much doubt that a reunion show would be nothing but classic GN'R songs. Hopefully some more ILLUSION material will re-emerge.

#17585 Re: Guns N' Roses » Guns N Roses on Universal Music Group Release List » 946 weeks ago

Bright Eyes 2005 wrote:

Some of you are so narrow-minded, unaware that The Replacements are arguably the most influential alt. rock band on the planet, and that Tommy Stinson, is more respected and recognized in a certain groups of rock fans than anyone from GNR.  BTW, the Mats have been steadily selling large volumes of records for twenty years.  Moreover, their recent reissues have been doing very well.  Most rock/music fans, ones who follow music and buy music, know who Tommy Stinson is--for that reason alone, he is a rock star. He may not be a celebrity like Slash or Axl, but he is a famous, recognizable, rock star.  If you are a member of The Replacements, GN'R, and founder of Bash and Pop and Perfect, you are a god damned rock star.   

Saying Tommy Stinson is not a rock star, is like saying that Frank Black is a nobody.  Wake the fuck up people, crawl out of the GNR cave, and check out some other caves (no pun intended Plato).

BTW, the question now isn't if a reunion is happening, it's when are we going to find out and if they have an album ready or in the pipeline.  Some info came to light, from certain "Name Brands" (LOL) which indicated something is happening, or everyone with Axl's best interests in mind are trying like hell to save his ass.  Slash and Duff work with Azoff (he's their manager)--it is no coincidence they are defending Axl.  They love the guy, and want to reach out to him.  They realize they shouldn't have left, and feel guilt that they let him slip into a hole at his house surrounded by sycophants , and did not stick around to pull him out of it and keep him grounded.  Axl is a vulnerable, fairly innocent guy, who just happens to be very talented and extremely insecure.  Old school friends, workers, and mentors are trying to get this guy back--and help him succeed and be happy.  That is all I am going to say, as I am now inferring things, based on small tidbits of info.  I would deduce, though, this is some of what is  happening.

I sure hope that isn't how they approach it "to get Axl back". If they go in there, and basically make him feel like he's been brainwashed, he's gonna burrow down into his classic 'GN'R wouldn't be here without Paul Huge or Beta' shtick.

Bright Eyes 2005 wrote:
Big Gun wrote:

hey man, i like infinity on high.:haha:

the killers are releasing their new album on the 25th of nov and a new single next week. if gnr were going to release CD in nov i believe the promo would have started. i'm still waiting till early october before i write off this year.

i have a feeling that if this album is not released this year i dont see it being released at all. i mean how long can negotiations go? the 'golden manager' hired at the begining of the year would have done something by now.

Universal most likely has given their final offer, and any additional negotiations are being done in vain.  The list at the beginning of the thread maybe a tentative schedule, as nothing is set in stone.  I would be shocked at this point if this comes out, or is scheduled prior to a reunion.

Universal has given their final offer, no doubt in my mind. The question now is when Axl will accept it as the final offer.

The 'negotiations' most likely are, Universal will release CD, after a reunion is announced and I assume touring is planned. They have to get back their $13 million dollar investment, and THEY KNOW the only way to do that is a reunion. There's no way to do it with a new band, and they don't really give a fuck what Axl's issues are, they give a fuck about their money. Which is totally understandable.

Axl has to realize at this point that he has NO platform to stand on with negotiations anymore. He's a washed up has been in their eyes, that's wasted their money. He has no way to negotiate anymore, because the name - W. Axl Rose - doesn't mean hardly anything anymore.

CD = 21

In some weird ass way.

#17586 Re: Guns N' Roses » Democracy not eligible for Billboard 200? » 946 weeks ago

There's no way i'm ordering it online. After all this time, I want the satisfaction of finishing the job, OLD SCHOOL.

I want to walk in to the store, and buy the album, and listen to it in the car on the ride home. Even if it's a 4-hour round trip.


But most wouldn't do that. I'm a diehard.

#17587 Re: Guns N' Roses » Stinson bailed? NME rumor. » 946 weeks ago

Bono wrote:
war wrote:

shackler's revenge wasn't released as a single for a reason. my guess is it was never meant to be on cd until recently when new management presented axl with the oppurtunity to release a new song in the game. since it was most likely  the best song he had for a video game, they seized the oppurtunity.

Ummm.... no I doubt it. In my opinion it was released ala Oh My God to test the waters. Releaseing a  song on Rock Band is just as effective as releaseing it as a single. It wasn't because it fit a video game best, it's casue they wanted to gage the response. Better would be much cooler for Rock Band but that's been heard and the fanbase needed to be fed another distarction. Shackler's is also a "tide me over" simply another smokescreen to distract people for the fact the album yet again will not be out by year's end.  Man I hate to say it again cause I know people hate it but............reunion first, Slash and Duff contribute to CD and then it comes out(if it comes out) then they tour. that or the entire thing is scrapped and the trio + whoever else record a new album and tour that, or simple tour and then record like Motley Crue is doing now. Either way I truely, hoestly belive the version of Gn'R we know now is totally dead in the water

Slash & Duff are not going to record CD songs. If Axl were planning a three album release, because they were complete (CD I, CD II, CD III), I could see Axl possibly cohercing Slash & Duff to record on the remaining CD sessions, for a fourth album, not called CD, that will make up a new Guns N' Roses record apart of the reunion.

Aside from that, I don't see it happening. And it might would be beneficial if they were "moving forward" to just forget CD ever happened. Release a "Unwanted Democracy" box set or something down the line, and just move on.

But you have made a great post Bono, and I think if anyone needs evidence of new-Guns being dead - go see NIN in concert. I hear their guitarist looks awfully familiar.

#17588 Re: Guns N' Roses » Democracy not eligible for Billboard 200? » 946 weeks ago

Exactly. I think a Best Buy exclusive would make an 'explicit' album more readily available, but are far as moving units, Wal-Mart would be a much smarter choice, and from what I hear - more money for GN'R.

The closest Best Buy for me is over 2 hours away.

#17589 Re: The Sunset Strip » Help with Horror » 946 weeks ago

Old Era:

Frankenstein, The Wolfman, Dracula, are all good starting points with these classics
Psycho
Night of the Living Dead
Dawn of the Dead
The Texas Chainsaw Massacre
Phantasm
Halloween I, II, III (are very good ones, although III was less successful)
Friday The 13th (anything in the first four would be good for a report)

New Era:

Scream
Saw
House of 1,000 Corpses
The Devil's Rejects

#17590 Re: The Garden » Pat Buchanan: "The Party's Over" » 946 weeks ago

I don't normally agree with just about anything Pat Buchanan says, but this is, as Randall put it - spot on.


We are not in a depression, but the significance of this economic situation is there will CERTAINTLY be a changing of the guard, especially after what Bush said really drove it home.

I don't think entirely this is a comment on conservativism, but yes, I do think this signals the death of the Reagan-era 'free market'.

It's over. DONE.

What was so good about Reaganomics was that he believed leaving the market alone, letting it make money and it's decisions freely, would lead to huge prosper and America would benefit. In the 80's this worked, and the idea works. Problem is the people running the banks destroyed it. DEAD.

We will never be able to trust allowing the free market to reign without much supervision again, and although this is not a Republican-bash, because unlike Nancy Pelosi, this is not the Republcans fault. But yes, one of the Republicans core values is a free market, and this is one thing the Democrats have been 100% about in spades for years - the market needs the government to supervise it and regulate it. THEY - CAN'T - BE - TRUSTED.

And that is evidently clear now.

And Randall, that was a great ass post. Especially the final few lines.

Board footer

Powered by FluxBB