You are not logged in. Please register or login.
- Topics: Active | Unanswered
#17691 Re: Guns N' Roses » Will you still buy CD? » 947 weeks ago
I think the bond with Izzy, and the same for Paul...
They understand WHAT he came from. I don't think any of them could meet him on that level. The same reason he lended a helping hand to Shannon Hoon.
#17692 Re: Guns N' Roses » The silence on the eve of RB2 is deafening! » 947 weeks ago
Axlin08 wrote:I'm half conviced Doug Miller is an alias.
Only you know who is up that late.
Please explain?
Axl updates the site himself.
#17693 Re: Guns N' Roses » No need to tour to promote? » 947 weeks ago
GUNS N' ROSES: Back In The Fuckin' U.K. - Live At Wembley Arena
On BLU-RAY
Would be nice.
#17694 Re: The Garden » Palin Power » 947 weeks ago
Agreed. Obama is a very moving man, with the ability to make you believe (he's certaintly moved me at times), but just because he's a good public speaker don't = good president. Carter, prime example.
Same for McCain. Experience don't mean shit. On paper, George H.W. Bush was the most qualified guy EVER for that job, YEARS in Washington, time in the service, head of the CIA, VP for eight years, etc... - weak ass president.
So they BOTH better start talking about the issues. The only person that seems to be doing that is Sarah Palin. You know, little miss dumb chick. She's the smartest one around lately. Obama keeps BOMBING HORRIBLE at fuckin' punchlines, McCain keeps trying to convince everyone around he's for 'change', Biden just spouts of about George Bush III in an almost drunken manner...
It's just really lame. Would you guys stop dickin' around and playing fast and loose with this election, and start talkin' turkey. Palin is sitting around looking like the classiest and smartest one of all, and probably the biggest thing she ever had to worry about was how many moose hunting licenses to grant in a year.
#17695 Re: The Garden » Palin family abuse of power » 947 weeks ago
I stand by that. And this is coming from a man who supports Barack Obama.
I just don't support 99% of the people AROUND him. Oh, and someone needs to get Biden fitted for a muzzle.
As for Palin, yes mitch, they are turning her into a sympathetic character. These BLOGGER attackers, just aren't working. Those cats at MoveOn.org just don't get it. They didn't get in 2004. They are so disconnected from reality it isn't even funny, and they think the Democratic party is THEIRS. It ain't. They're not helping Obama.
Bottom line - Palin is likeable. There's nothing to attack Palin with. And sexism in the media doesn't help, that goes for Hilary too. The media smacked her around like a drunk redneck coming home to his wife and a warm beer.
The American people, Republican AND Democrat, have not liked how this woman is being treated. Hilary neither. And they just keep doing it over and over and over, and notice as it's went along, McCain's favor has went UP.
Mitch, you're not damned if you do and damned if you don't. No no no, what it is, is that Obama should be talking about ISSUES. ISSUES. McCain, you too, you don't escape my wrath. But when Obama's ads sit around talking about Bridge to Nowhere, and McCain's ads spend time on why Obama didn't choose Hilary (what the fuck?), it's just turned into a mud slinging fest.
I thought BOTH of you guys were marketing change. Same old politics to me.
#17696 Re: The Garden » Charles Gibson interviews Sarah Palin » 947 weeks ago
Axlin08 wrote:Good interview by Palin. The biggest thing people like about her is she's not "Washington". She's an outsider.
This just gives her more creedence. If Israel decides to take out Iran, then they have my blessing. Iran ain't nothin' but towel wrappin' jew haters anyways, and if Iran makes one counter back, we'll go in with our nuclear arms. No problem with it whatsoever. It's time Islamic facism was wiped off the face of the earth. No different than the Nazis. Same goes for Lebanon.
So we should basically nuke an entire country where most of the people in the country are perfectly normal fine peaceful people because they might have a few racist, extremists. I mean in your country of America I'm pretty sure there must be a few fundamental extremists from many religions. We gonna nuke every US state to get rid of them?
Anyone who agrees with using nuclear weapons doesn't deserve a vote on anything. I mean you call Iran "jew haters" but just before it make a racist remark by calling them "towel wrappers". That's deregotary. I have a friend who is Iranian, his mother's Iranian and almost all of his relatives are. Are you suggesting I go and kill them. Here's some news for you. They are all about as left wing as you can get and none of them are
towel wrappin' jew haters
Grow up.
I need to grow up? I NEED TO GROW UP?
Are you kidding?
I come from a country that's NOT anti-semetic. I come from a country that provides WOMEN rights. I come from a country that doesn't persecute people because of their religion or kill them because they aren't the right religion. I come from a country that provides MINORITES rights. I come from a country that a GAY man or GAY woman can at least walk down the street (hopefully get married one day), but we're getting there.
AND I NEED TO GROW UP?
That's fuckin' rich. All those cats that don't provide those things, in any of those countries, and still live like it's 50 years ago, and in some places 500... you'll have to excuse me if the word RAG HEAD slips out now and again.
#17697 Re: Guns N' Roses » Will you still buy CD? » 947 weeks ago
I don't think he'll ever feel about the new guys, even if it goes south, the same as the old guys.
At the end of the day, I think he respects the old band as artists, but he LIKES Buckethead, Izzy Stradlin, NIN, Replacements, etc.
#17698 Re: Guns N' Roses » What we expect from on official CD release » 947 weeks ago
I remember that quote, but that's not how I took it.
I think what Tommy was getting at, was that some of the songs are epics, i.e. TWAT, If The World, #2, but even the new band epics are only about 6-1/2 minutes total.
There would be no Coma, or Estranged or November Rain, clocking in at 10 minutes long.
jmho
#17699 Re: Guns N' Roses » The silence on the eve of RB2 is deafening! » 947 weeks ago
I'm half conviced Doug Miller is an alias.
Only you know who is up that late.
#17700 Re: Guns N' Roses » No need to tour to promote? » 947 weeks ago
Bands don't tour to support albums anymore. I mean, I know they DO, but it's not really necessary to established brand names, like - GUNS N ROSES.
They'll use the Rock Band 2 promotion, which I can't remember if it was Rock Band or Guitar Hero III that had Motley Crue's Saints of LA, which ended up being MORE successful than iTunes.
Rock Band 2 is gonna provide major promotion, and major word of mouth, that combined with some singles, and maybe a couple of SIMPLE (yes Axl, SIMPLE) videos, should do the trick, with no tour whatsoever. Understand that even with GNR's major marketability, MTV, MTV2, and even VH1 for the most part have moved past these acts.
GN'R might be a big marketable act, but just like other timeless artists such as Bruce Springsteen & Queen+PR, and other metal acts like Motley Crue, & Metallica, who are probably going to see the most major exposure through one network - VH1 Classic.
Which will no doubt be enough. If Poison can still get major exposure because of that channel, GN'R will be a piece of cake.
Another net that might be majorly interested in Guns is the pro-emo network Fuse. Most of their stuff is gay, but they have a big interest in throwback artists, especially ones like GN'R or Metallica or even Nirvana for that matter, that are still popular with the younger generation.
