You are not logged in. Please register or login.
- Topics: Active | Unanswered
#17701 Re: Guns N' Roses » What we expect from on official CD release » 947 weeks ago
I personally think the new album will contain at least the following...
Chinese Democracy
The Blues
Madagascar
Better
I.R.S.
T.W.A.T.
If The World
Song #2 (if it's actually Prostitute, and I think it is)
Shackler's Revenge
and nothing but new unheard tracks to fill out the remaining slots.
Axl has alluded or flat out said on countless occasions for fan's to be patient, and when it comes, it's gonna come big time to tide over the long wait. Whether that means a stacked album, like Use Your Illusion I at 16 tracks filling up the entire album, or like the Illusions, a double-album concept, I dunno. My guess is CD I will be absolutely stacked at nearly 80 minutes to tide over the long wait, and will be GNR's longest album. I think the remaining stuff will be fast tracked, possibly seeing a GN'R release each year, maybe CD II next year, CD III the year after that, CD IV the following year, you get the idea. And maybe in the mean time little goodies like an EP of the axed CD tracks (for which I think Rhiad & Silkworms will be apart of) will be released, and maybe a live album featuring the new band.
We'll see. All good, reasonable, ideas.
But if CD comes out, after all these years, even if it's stuff i've already heard, and it barely scratches the 50-minute mark... yeah I might get a 'tad upset.
#17702 Re: Guns N' Roses » We still might get CD before X-Mas » 947 weeks ago
gnrfan87 is right.
I hear what you're saying madagas, but MANY multiple source over MANY years have reported CD being close.
I can remember this spot in 2006 too, multiple source, nothing happened.
I can remember all of this stuff in 2002 after the VMA performance. Nothing.
I can remember an actual release date being recognized for November 2001, and people actually PRE-ORDERING it at many locations and many record retailers. Nothing.
Like James said, at this point, as a long time Gun(wait)er, i'll believe it when I see it. Hopefully it's true. *fingers crossed*
#17703 Re: Guns N' Roses » Will you still buy CD? » 947 weeks ago
see for me (going with that mindset axlin08) i am the kinda guy who will support any thing that axl or slash release as long as the product is something that they endorse...for instance i never bought hollywood rose cuz axl didnt agree with it...i dont buy unauthorized bios, i dont buy tributes to gnr, i didnt buy gnr greatest hits....these products were not endorsed by those guys but have the gnr moniker on them
especially the GH package....i mean if axl and slash can agree on something then that really says alot...and trying to block the release of GH was somethign that they both agreeed on...prolly the only thing they have agreed on since TSI was released
Agreed. I only own what's endorsed by the band.
I just have a real problem giving money to people who are trying to make money off of the GN'R name. A name that was built by other men. One could pose that argument to the new band, but the difference is they are offcially sanctioned members of Guns N' Roses who contributed to future albums. I'll buy their solo records too, even former members such as Bucket or Izzy.
But when it comes to these cash grabs by other people, such as Hollywood Rose or the tribute albums, i'll only download for free just to hear what it's like. Most of the time I puke, and then delete it.
I still refuse to purchase ANY books on GN'R other than "Slash".
#17704 Re: Guns N' Roses » Information on Shackler's Revenge » 947 weeks ago
Well i'm just saying if there's a deal involved, Best Buy are not gonna march to the tune of one W. Axl Rose.
If they think they can make money, they'll run the GN'R name and the CD title out there as much as is absolutely necessary to make the upmost money possible 'til you're ready to puke.
#17705 Re: Guns N' Roses » IGN: Shacklers Revenge Hands-On » 947 weeks ago
I've got this really nervous feeling, just like 2006, and as a GN'R fan you're just waiting for it to fall apart, and the excuse-laden press release to be around the corner.
#17706 Re: Guns N' Roses » We still might get CD before X-Mas » 947 weeks ago
Actually bri, i've heard fans say that before just in gossiping.
So yeah, he could've pulled that out of his ass.
#17707 Re: The Garden » Palin family abuse of power » 947 weeks ago
Honestly James, that's the God's honest truth. These people that think this helps Obama are - DEAD WRONG.
They are turning Palin into a SYMPATHETIC CHARACTER. Every time one of these articles turns up, it GAINS McCain/Palin more votes.
Good job liberals! The best candidate you had in years, you are DESTROYING his campaign. Yay.... give 'em a hand folks!
#17708 Re: The Garden » Democrats’ latest idea: gas stamps » 947 weeks ago
How about just LOWERING THE FUCKING PRICES?
Or is that too hard for the most powerful country in the world? No, it's cause America is making money off of that high gas.
#17709 Re: The Garden » Biden: "Hillary a better pick than me" » 947 weeks ago
As a pro-gay marriage voter, I can honestly say that anyone who votes for Obama because he's a Democrat and a free thinker on THAT issue, is wasting their time.
He's just as Christian as McCain or Palin.
#17710 Re: The Garden » Charles Gibson interviews Sarah Palin » 947 weeks ago
Axlin08 wrote:Good interview by Palin. The biggest thing people like about her is she's not "Washington". She's an outsider.
This just gives her more creedence. If Israel decides to take out Iran, then they have my blessing. Iran ain't nothin' but towel wrappin' jew haters anyways, and if Iran makes one counter back, we'll go in with our nuclear arms. No problem with it whatsoever. It's time Islamic facism was wiped off the face of the earth. No different than the Nazis. Same goes for Lebanon.
so you are okay with the use of nuclear weapons? Do you honestly think thats the answer? Ladies and gentlemen, when all the republicans in this thread go off about the arrogance of liberals, this post is a shining example of the hypocritical thoughts they posses. Calling for nuclear war and the elimination of an entire culture is completely absurd.
I watched that interview and Palin's answers were childish and borderline whiny. You could easily tell that she had no idea what she is talking about and what responsibilities a vp has.
As long as my ENEMIES are down with nuclear weapons, i'll be down with them. I'm all for - 
- but they're gonna have to meet me in the middle.
As for myself, i'm not a Republican sir. I know that's hard to believe that some of us can be down for kicking ass and have a strong foreign & military policy, and also be a progressive thinker at the same time. 
As for Palin, Charlie Gibson is a biased douche that HARDBALLED Palin (pardon the expression) in one the most obviously SEXIST tones and inflection-driven interviews ever. Gibson treated her like she was a dumb chick that he would walk right over, and she gave back as good as she got.
If you think i'm crazy, go see Gibson's interview with John Edwards from 2004. Seriously. He softballs that thing so bad, that I thought he was gonna get on his knees and start going down on Edwards.
