Is it switching OL systems from power types to the quicker more nimble type OL zone blocking types that are needed in the Shanhan system?  Generally (this is outsider perspective) I thought the Pats were good at developing OL.  The other thing is I don't see a good WR on the roster.  I think WR are a little overvalued but you kind of have to have at worst solid starter types. I don't think you need a "star" per se but you do need guys can start and contribute.  I don't really see this in the WR that NE has.  Maybe it's wrong because I don't watch them but Agolohor, Jakoby Myers, Devante Parker, and Bourne don't seem like the greatest.  I like Parker as a bounce back candidate though (not a TUA fan at all in MIA, kinda dumb for them to trade for Hill).  It might take a year if they are switching offensive systems just to get personel in there.

I think they can shut down Jackson.  Gotta follow the KC blueprint.  Be disciplined and don't overpursue.  Get your best DB to shadow Mark Andrews.  Make him throw outside.  Just be glad you don't play them in week one: they destroy teams.  It's ok if they get a bunch of rushing yards, clamp down in the red zone and force them to settle for FG.

The Titans look OK.  Their WR room was god awful last year due to depth and injuries.  I don't think Brown wanted to be there anymore and made ridiculous contract demands.  They were forced to trade him.  They got decent value.  They also had no TE to replace Jonnu Smith.  They had problems in the middle of the field because of this.  They signed Austin Hooper and drafted some TE in the mid rounds.  The OL may the problem.  They need to pass block better.  Tannehill gets maligned on a national level.  No one was putting up stats on the Titans last year with their OL pass blocking issues and WR that were going in and out.  Think the 2019 Pats season with Brady.  I think they win the divison and make the playoffs, outside of that I have no clue.

This is really weird to me.  They seemed to have a decent offensive system last year to ease in Mac Jones as a rookie starting QB.  I mean bludgeon teams with the run.  Then take deep shots with the outside WR on play action passes.  Then use both TE down the seams/middle of the field.  A lot of teams use this philosophy/system and it works.  Once Mac proves/gets conformatable add more onto the guy's plate etc.  Patricia who was a good DC is now calling the plays on offense?  This reminds me of when the Eagles gave their DC slot to the OL coach.  It would probably make more sense to have Judge call the plays since he has more experience on the offensive side of the ball.  Belicheck is the GOAT coach, so I guess you just have to wait and see. 

No idea what to think about the Ravens.  The only super difficult game on the first four is @GB.  The first 3 are pick em/winnable to me.

This is just conjecture and rumors but I read where she was doing Connery and that's why she got the break in Entrapement.  That and the Douglas marriage kept her at A list for a few years until she had mental issues, bipolar I think.

I'm curious how this goes.  I saw this awful movie preview yesterday.  It was for the gay/trans movie called Bros.  I'm objecting to it not because any of the trans, gay, woke nonsense, but it just looked a damn awful film whose jokes I didn't find funny at all.  Pretty sure Im not the only person who thought this film preview was awful.  I hope people are able to raise objections to this film (or any other film) based on the film itslef.

I don't actually mind Clooney.  I think he's miscast a little as this classic leading man type when he is kind of a smug asshole in most of his films.  I think he is an A listeer.  But I don't think his roles or rep matches what he actually is as an actor which I'm not sure makes any sense at all.

I find Matt Damon really boring though.  I think the Departed may have been the only thing I liked.  I remember watching The Talented Mr. Ripley and watching Jude Law act in circles all around Damon and wondering why the hell Law wasn't cast as Ripley. I too can stand Damon in Private Ryan but that's probably because he isn't in the movie that long.  I think Affleck is probably the worse actor of the two but I can tolerate him more than Damon.

I need to rewatch Schindler's List.  I remember being quite moved when I saw it in the 90s.  Of all the 90s films that were super over,  I've found that Forrest Gump doesn't really hold up.  I watched it a few years ago and just found it totally annoying and ridiculous.  This is not really a shot on Hanks who is a fine actor and still an A-lister now in the 2020s.  It's very hard to stay on top in Hollywood for that long.

Aside from the usual Fiennes roles that everyone seems to know, Strange Days that was a 90s film was a really good Fiennes (and sci fi movie).

The problem with Rappaport is he is a supporting actor.  Every time I see him elevated in something higher to that it fails.  I had a problem with the end of Inception too but it's a good film.

Nocturama.  This ones really weird.  A bunch of Parisian kids plan out a bunch of bombings  and hide out in a shopping mall afterwards.  Of the two parts , the bombing part/planning is the better half.  When they head to the mall, it stops the momentum for a bit.  I just find it hard to connect the consumer "aspect" to what I just watched.  It doesn't totally derail the film.   But watching it, you just realize what morons most of the characters are and how pointless the acts of terrorism were.  My fav part is when someone mentions their acts barely got mentioned on facebook.  Still I did enjoy this film and the beginning and end of this film where there is almost zero diaglogue is very intense and interesting.

Savage Three.  some 70s Italian crime film.  This one's too much of a downer for me and it isn't as good as the other's I've seen .  I like the cop that tries to solve the crimes but it is just depressing watching people commit crimes for the "hell of it"