You are not logged in. Please register or login.
- Topics: Active | Unanswered
#551 Re: Guns N' Roses » DAVE MUSTAINE: 'It Would Be Terrific' If STEVEN ADLER And IZZY STRADLI » 562 weeks ago
polluxlm wrote:As a person who have never heard a Megadeth album, I will always remember Dave Mustaine as the guy who broke down in tears on a Metallica documentary, because he was kicked out of the band 25 years ago.
Can't blame him - they were all drunks - kicked him out with no warning or rehab - stole his riffs - and went on to become the biggest metal act of all time
This x $100,000,000 bucks
I knew Monkey would nail it. I don't blame Dave for crying. Even with Megadeth's success, they are a niche act compared to Metallica. Metallica was so big, they transcended being a metal act and became a legendary rock act. Metallica is easily the biggest metal act of all time, and that's if you count Sabbath & Priest. Still, Metallica on top.
Mustaine got fucking SCREWED by all of his buddies. Dave might be a dick, but that fucking awesome Kill 'Em All album (still my favorite to this day), has Dave all over it. No matter what Metallica says. That album is practically an early Megadeth record more than it is a Metallica record. Even by Lightning they had kind of changed their style, and by Puppets they were a totally different beast, while Mustaine was playing catch-up with Megadeth.
#552 Re: Guns N' Roses » Watching Welcome to the Videos » 562 weeks ago
Well the reason I loved it so much, is because it was time I ever saw Guns N' Roses.
That video made me discover them.
#553 Re: Guns N' Roses » Looks like rehearsals have started! » 562 weeks ago
Richard is the best choice period. More technically proficient. I personally feel Izzy's been out of the game for too long. Izzy to me should have a studio presence, but I don't see Izzy touring and/or doing anything more than a guest spot for a few songs here and there. Richard & Tommy of the new GN'R guys had the most old GN'R to them. Richard will fit right in.
Dizzy was a lock. Hell, Dizzy was more of a lock than Slash & Duff. 
I still am curious what the drummer situation is. I also don't think Pitman is a lock yet. Especially after how TB handled is publicly announcing his involvement. They might as well just told him "whoa there bud. Don't count your chickens before they hatch. Don't call us, we'll call you!"
I think Chris will be there, but still it's a little bizarre.
#554 Re: Guns N' Roses » Steven Tyler says that he has been working on the return of GN'R » 562 weeks ago
Axlin16 wrote:But having the silence isn't business as usual... not this time imo. There's a methodology behind it. Axl, Slash & TB HAVE TO KNOW, that the first moment that Axl & Slash embrace or are seen on a stage that it's gonna be a huge moment. HUGE. I'd say bigger than Roger or David or Robert & Jimmy, mainly because Axl & Slash were NOT on good terms for such a long time, although they never reached a level of absolute hatred, but they certainly skirted it for a long time. Izzy came across as more hateful towards Axl than any of them.
I don't think Slash hated Axl, he just had problems with Axl's antics (like showing up late to gigs, replacing Slash's guitar parts with other people, acting like a dictator in general, etc). At one point in the late 1980's, Keith Richards told Slash that you never quit no matter what. I think Slash took that advice very seriously and hung on as long as he could.
But there was absolute hatred on Axl's part directed at Slash. "He's a cancer that should have left after Appetite," throwing out fans who wore shirts with Slash on them to early nu-GNR gigs, "Where's Slash? He's in my ass," and on and on.
Ehh, I disagree. Reading Slash's book, by that 1994-96 period, Slash seemed to be at that stage where you could tell that there was no love lost between the two, and was bordering on hatred, mainly because of career decisions Slash was making outside of Guns, without Axl's consent (not that it was any of his fucking business).
Slash in his book also conveniently skirted all of the VERY negative interviews he was doing at the time in relation to GN'R, which was in turn directly related to Axl. At that point, GN'R had both had Izzy & Steven both publically slamming them, and now Slash was turning, whom Axl considered a brother. Even if Axl was the bad guy in it, Slash's behavior didn't help anything, and just drove them further apart.
Slash left those parts out of his book.
Especially if Axl felt that bringing his good friend Paul in (as a favor) for replacing Gilby, whom he could write with, and Axl had previously brought in Paul songs and thought it was okay. Axl might've looked at it as he had the best intentions, and because Gilby was shown the door without Slash's consent, Slash decided to show his ass, and publicly denounce Paul, which then put Axl into a very compromising situation.
I still think this "personal" beef that Steven Tyler spoke is rooting somewhere in the Slash/Paul dynamic from that mid-90's period.
There's a thin line between love and hate.
This.
I think the reason Axl's so venomous and personal attack back towards Slash was there (and vice versa), but especially Axl was because Axl loved Slash so much that he felt Slash quitting was a huge betrayal. A band is like a marriage, and from Axl's perspective by leaving the partnership in 1995, taking the name with him, but offering Slash & Duff a full partnership in his new arrangement, was Axl going out of his way to throw a bone to two junkies ('cause they were trainwrecks during that period) and keeping the light of GN'R on.
When Slash balked and made everything difficult with IFOCS, the 1995 GN'R album, and the new Uzi Suicide deal, Axl probably saw it as going out of his way to coddle Slash, only to have Slash to spit in his face, THEN have Slash go play the media game against Axl for the next 7-10 years.
If that was his perspective, I don't blame him. I would've hated Slash's fucking guts too.
Here's to hoping it's all behind them and that 2016 will be the resurrection of their friendship... at least on stage and in-studio that is.

#555 Re: Guns N' Roses » How STEVEN TYLER Helped Reunite GUNS N' ROSES » 562 weeks ago
I don't believe it's about the Michael Jackson thing, even though that was a real beef then. It might've started then, but it morphed into something else.
Axl did an interview recently in the last few years (can't remember which), but I do remember it making Yahoo! News, and Axl named off many different artists that inspire him and remain his favorites, and many of them were associated 1970s acts.
Michael Jackson was one of them.
He could've been trolling, but I doubt it. He cited Jackson as an influence. Me thinks Axl got more information and realized all of MJ's deal for the witch hunt setup that it all was, and dropped all that shit. I dunno.
I don't think their beef has to do with MJ.
#556 Re: Guns N' Roses » RICHARD FORTUS And DIZZY REED Exit THE DEAD DAISIES » 562 weeks ago
We obviously all knew this was coming, but I don't get all the secrecy with these guys at all. Why is it such a huge secret for Fortus & Reed to be apart of a reunited GN'R?
You would think if camp GN'R would've made everything so super-secret, they would've announced Axl, Richard, Dizzy & Chris, and then went dark, and let speculation mount about Slash, Duff, and Steven/Matt.
#557 Re: GN'R Downloads » Rock In Rio 3 (2001) Directv source » 562 weeks ago
Yeah i've never understood the fascination people have with this show, other than the fact that when I was in high school, it was the first appearence of GN'R in 7 years, and everybody freaked the fuck out to see Axl in that way.
I don't feel the band was quite tight then. Axl was in good spirits, even if Mickey Axl made an appearence, but to me Robin & Bucket hadn't quite found their groove, and to me Richard Fortus sounded better in 2002 than Paul did at Rio III.
It's sad a more pro-shot show never happened in the Fall of 2002 (other than the disastrous VMA appearence).
That Boston 2002 & MSG 2002... the band is fucking TIGHT. Everybody really found their groove. So wish in hind-sight that Axl had released his techno-Chinese w/ Bucket during that period. It'd been bad ass.
#558 Re: The Sunset Strip » Most Recent Movie You've Seen » 562 weeks ago
You loved Hateful Eight for it's Sergio Leone-esque style, but yet haven't finished Django Unchained? Haha.
Django is a fucking masterpiece. That whole bit with Leo, Jamie & Samuel L. Jackson, when Django comes up there and the black plantation hand tells Jamie, "Nigga get off that horse!", and Leo tells Samuel, "No no, you can't say that to him... he's a free-man!", and Jackson looks at him and looks back at Django, "Nigga get off that horse", Leo, "no no, you can't say that he's a freeman"
Puts me in stitches every time. The Don Johnson bit with all the Klan members trying to posse up to run up Django, but none of their sheets are right and they want to be home for dinner, and all that shit is a riot too.
I really thought Tarentino was VERY overrated over the years. Never got the hype. Django Unchained was the first flick of his I saw, that was just blown away by. VERY VERY good. With Kurt Russell, Samuel L. Jackson, Walton Goggins all in Hateful 8, I have no doubt it's great. I'd watch those three read a phonebook.
#559 Re: The Sunset Strip » Friends » 562 weeks ago
And just think, that picture above is her with LESS makeup.
I've seen her where she tones down all the fucking eyeliner and lipstick she wears. She did a celeb softball game for charity awhile back and was so hot.
She's just one of those that actually wears TOO MUCH makeup. Carrie Underwood is another. She's hot with makeup. She's gorgeous with bare-minimum. Those are the keepers.
#560 Re: The Sunset Strip » Greatest 200 Billboard Albums of All Time » 562 weeks ago
Yeah I was exhausted when I posted that.
Billboard, sorry.

