You are not logged in. Please register or login.
- Topics: Active | Unanswered
#661 Re: The Sunset Strip » The Video Game Console Thread » 564 weeks ago
I completely agree on DLC's. Prices are just crazy, and you have to draw a line somewhere. I've recently been playing Batman: Arkham Knight (finally). I bought the sum bitch in early July (shortly after it was released), I bought it digital-download off of PSN, because I wanted to play it immediately. It cost me $59.99. I played the Poison Ivy capture deal (like the first thing), then got busy, and never picked it up again until Black Friday in November, I got a special deal + coupon where I bought the "Season Pass" for like $23 bucks off of PSN to get all the current DLC. I started over, played the Poison Ivy mission again... then got busy.
I started it AGAIN, and now i'm in it and like a quarter done. It's cool, it's great, the graphics rule, it's a nice sequel, Mark Hamill returns, but the Batmobile thing SUCKKKKKSSSSS.
But back to the DLC, there's alot of things to like about the "Season Pass" (I got screwed on the Arkham Origins one from a couple years ago), but at the same time... I just can't help... but to feel CHEATED.
All of this stuff is downloaded -- but locked. So it's already in the game. But then you have to pay for it. I payed $83 dollars (in total) for Batman: Arkham Knight... and I didn't even get a game disc. Nothing. If I would've bought the Premium Edition (Game + Season Pass), it would've cost $100 bucks. $100 Bucks!!! For a fucking video game?!?!
Am I old?
Now i'm probably going to Pre-Order "MLB: The Show 16--MVP Edition" for $69.99 (but i'll probably get 20% off). It's got all kinds of bonus stuff, but nothing earth-shattering. The best probably being a collectible Steelbook for American League MVP 3B Josh Donaldson of the Toronto Blue Jays, which looks really cool and I really want as an MLB & PS4 fan.
But there's another version... the "Digital Deluxe Edition" for $100 bucks... and it's ENTIRELY digital. $100 bucks?!?!? For a fucking baseball game that comes out every year with a roster update, no changes to uniforms, and it's $100 bucks? Madden does the exact same thing. So does Call of Duty.
I mean... you get to the point where you DRAW A LINE. $100 bucks is too fucking much for a video game, that in 6 months will be yesterday's news and available on Amazon for usually $25 bucks, if not less.
The greed, and locking people out of games is getting ridiculous.
#662 Re: The Sunset Strip » Alan Rickman, giant of British film and theatre, dies at 69 » 564 weeks ago
Dude was a living freaking legend. I was in shock when I heard the news. Brits are taking it hard man... Lemmy, Bowie, Ricky... man.
RIP
#663 Re: The Sunset Strip » Friends » 564 weeks ago
I never, EVER got the thing about this show. Seinfeld, yes... but I remember liking ALOT of other sitcoms of that period WAY more than Friends. Everybody Loves Raymond just off the top of my head was one.
#664 Re: The Sunset Strip » Ash vs. Evil Dead » 564 weeks ago
Wow! That's a great story Apex. I certainly am old enough to remember being apart of the legendary 80s video store (although more of my time was in the 90s), and I certainly remember bonding with alot of crap movies (Vestron Video anyone?), because they were kinda taboo, the mom & pop stores had B-movies on the cheap, and that is exactly how I discovered the Evil Dead Trilogy.
So yeah, with crazy ass shit like a Tree Rape scene, I can totally get why the youth elsewhere got their hands on Evil Dead, and thought they had the holy (or unholy) grail in their hands.
Wow...
#665 Re: The Garden » Donald Trump running for President » 564 weeks ago
They all now have Totalitarian jams...
Anybody remember that viral video that the State Department Propagandists put out that had the little black girl singing how "Obama is gonna save us all, oooh yeah, he's gonna save us" or however the fuck it went. They had her intentionally sing it like an "old Negro spiritual", so it came across as a Church Hymn, like Obama was Christ or something.
All of it is really lame. 
Other than that... I got mad respect for Trump's massive BALLS. Going around, at his caliber, and saying things like "what's the difference between Bill Clinton & Bill Cosby?", Bin Laden didn't die in 2011, "Obama & Hilary created ISIS"
That shit is brutal honesty, and frankly it's gonna get a bullet in him if he's not careful.
Still... ballsy.
#666 Re: Guns N' Roses » Reunited GUNS N' ROSES To Play New T-Mobile Arena In Las Vegas » 564 weeks ago
Hah, then we can have a contest for who sounds worse... Axl or James?
Last time I heard James, Axl sounded vintage on AFDem. Hetfield was sounded like he vocally was... kinda finished.
#667 Re: Guns N' Roses » Looks like rehearsals have started! » 564 weeks ago
Save a few songs, the soundtrack to GTA V is my least favorite. I did take a stripper on a long detour to her house when Big Log came on the radio. Awesome drive song at night, especially when you're getting g a blow job
It certainly is an eclectic soundtrack. I thought the inclusion of Hollywood-based stuff like Loggins' "Danger Zone" from Top Gun & "I'm Free (Heaven Helps The Man)" from Footloose, as well as Don Johnson's "Heartbeat" & Eddie Murphy's "Party All The Time" was ace, and perfect to sell some of the 80s revisionism that's going now and how that stuff is somehow cool and immortal now. I thought it was smart on their part to include that stuff.
I even thought the Robert Plant stuff was unique, as well as others. The producers said they wanted the radio station in GTA V to sound like a radio station in SoCal in 2013. I can't really speak for that, especially with the advent of internet radio, but WITH internet radio there does seem to be a broader selection of songs that now are played in other regions that aren't played in others. Some DJ's play deeper cuts than others, and there are others that play it safe with the hits. Who knows.
But yeah, I felt like GTA V kinda missed it on the soundtrack front, and easily was the weakest since GTA III. Still with that said, maybe i'm rock-pop biased, but I still think the Loggins' rock station was the best on the game, and even still I felt like Loggins was good, but the music selection was hit and miss.
For the first time ever, short of the GTA V talk station with Michelle & Lazlow, I found myself after I listened the shit out of the rock & old school rap station, turning the game's radio off later on, and listened to my own talk radio or tunes, while I played the game, which is kinda sad. Vice City, San Andreas & GTA IV all had STRONG radio options. I was underwhelmed by GTA V's selection.
I also have been VERY disappointed by the lack of DLC story-mode expansion, in favor of beating off to GTA Online, which PS4 owners have to pay for, like XBox. Disappointing.
#668 Re: Guns N' Roses » Something is up with Pitman » 564 weeks ago
If the world is a kick ass track no doubt. Madagascar has not aged very well at all
I agree and don't agree with you at all.
1) Madagascar is a great track. Period. One of my favorites on Chinese for several reasons.
2) If the World has not aged well for me, but I get your point (i'll explain further)
3) Maddy is the superior track imo
The problem is, Maddy was one of the earliest concoctions that Axl came up with, specifically with your favorite keyboardist Chris Pitman. Actually I think at that time, Axl, Chris, Dizzy & Paul were working on that tune, before anyone else was there to replace the old Guns.
So this track is probably circa 1998-99, at a time when Chinese Democracy was in its infancy. By the time the track was heard in 2001-02, it was cool, and fresh. By the time it was heard in 2006, it was dated -- very dated. By the time it got released in a proper studio form in 2008, although the tune kicked ass (through 1998 ears, as opposed to 2008 ones), Maddy was a great tune, but suffered from the same problems certain songs on Contraband suffer from today. Trapped in the time they were recorded, BECAUSE they attempted to be fresh and current, as opposed to traditional and timeless.
Maddy is a great tune, and remains one of my favorites from the period. If the World on the other hand, I believe I made a comment in 2008 here that I thought the song would age well, and in alot of ways ITW has aged well, not because of it's quality or lack thereof, but more so from its simplistic, flamenco-guitar flavored style, goes more traditional, and has a sexy style, that was ahead of its time and that very much is in the same vein of contemporary artists such as Adele, Lana, even Coldplay-ish as well. A different song for Guns, and certainly very-Axl, but the song just happened to be where several pop/rock artists went into in the 2010s.
Maddy was dated when it was released, because it's an old cut. If the World just happened to be a trend-setter without even knowing it.
#669 Re: Guns N' Roses » Reunited GUNS N' ROSES To Play New T-Mobile Arena In Las Vegas » 564 weeks ago
sp1at wrote:Reading have announced in March before, there is no immediate rush
I'd have thought Axl would have learned before now after the previous times.
polluxlm wrote:Don't see them giving up on the Euro festivals. Lots of money and PR there.
Funnily enough I seen a thread on MYGNR where people were suggesting Gun's wouldn't be selling out shows in Europe
.
This is why MyGNR is such a hard read for me... some of the comments are just... full of idiocy. They won't sell out in Europe?
Listen folks, the ONLY place GN'R will struggle to sell out will be North America. Why?
Because the U.S. (not so much Canadians & Mexicans) are loaded with a bunch of bandwagon pussies that pay money to see, and only see, whatever TMZ is talking about. Americans do not have near the appreciation of music that i've seen from people elsewhere and internationally.
GN'R will have no problem internationally. Hell Axl was doing good business in Europe and GREAT business in South America, WITHOUT Slash.
They'll have no problem outside of America. None. Europe, South America, Japan, Australia... all will be big business imo.
I think the first shows will sell out, or at least do really well.
The novelty factor of having Slash and Duff back will sell tickets in the beginning. The second year will be harder
Depends on what people are getting. Right now I think people are starved for this. Rock is dead. Brand names sell, and right now brand names are all that's surviving. Hell, even AC/DC can do stadiums. Alot of people have compared GNR's situation with the Van Halen situation and that all of this came 10 years too late to the dance. I disagree wholeheartedly. While I will agree Axl waited FAR too long to drop Chinese, I wonder if this timing of the reunion was perfect, for the first time in Guns history, they have perfect timing. Had this happened 10 years ago, yes Axl would've been in shape, but Slash wouldn't have been. The acrimony would've been stronger, the hatred still deep seeded, especially after the 2005 fiasco, and VR being at their peak, while GN'R was thought dead until 2006, and again that was a false start, like 2002. Axl was in the best shape all around he had been in the post-old days-era, singing with vigor and renewed energy, and was in GREAT shape. Slash on the other hand was secretly battling a pill addiction, a touch n' go marriage, a new issue with lead singer Weiland... there were issues. Izzy & Duff might've been on board, but Steven was not fully sober and was not psychologically ready for it. Now? A totally different story. GN'R are in a position to write their own return, repair their story, and write their own end game, and cement their legacy forever -- if this is done right. The only people who have stressed again and again that this is not a reunion is the media, to play up sensationalism and conflict for hits, and the diehards who all suck each others dicks. To the rest of the REAL WORLD, this is a full blown reunion, and although Eddie Trunk calls it "Slash joining Axl's band", do not underscore this -- Guns N' Roses -- THE REAL Guns N' Roses -- ARE BACK!
Those things appeal to ALOT of people. A-LOT. Van Halen should've reunited in 1996. 'Fo 'sho. Dave dicked it up, wanted to be there but didn't wanna behave to be there, and Eddie was an asshole right out of the gate, and made excuses why it couldn't happen, and it was a one-off moment that got blown up into something they never thought it would be, but like KISS at the same time, the iron was suddenly scorching hot, and VH followed it all up with bringing in a THIRD vocalist, which killed ALL credibility. Cherone was never gonna be accepted -- and wasn't. Then fast-forward to 10 years later and suddenly they had all drifted into parody territory and NEEDED a reunion. That's a different place.
GN'R isn't that. Maybe Duff & Steven or Matt, need the gig, but not the rest. Duff imo was coming back regardless of whether Slash returned. Izzy could care less, Dizzy's got a good job with Axl wherever Axl goes, Slash had built his own brand finally to a place that he had become a successful solo artist, enough that he abandoned the VR band or any plans for a third album, and although Axl wasn't doing anything earth-shattering, Axl can still book gigs and do a few thousand people a night to a point that it would make most groups jealous of their business.
If they WANT this, and not just for the money, but truly WANT this, and not NEED this, like VH, the energy put into these shows could be killer. GN'R, unlike Van Halen, are still young enough that their music still appeals to a broad demographic, much broader than a VH. Most of GNR's classic back catalog is still played on modern rock radio (unlike Van Halen... well except for Running With The Devil), and their branding still has a hip-vibe to it, and not "your dad's favorite band" like VH. Even when this announcement came, it trended with people who go viral in this day and age, unlike VH. VH reuniting appealed to all of rock. GN'R reuniting appealed to all of mainstream music.
Different story. If Axl comes in and kills ala 2006-07 & 2010, and/or GN'R have all these wild bs stories everywhere about whatever the fuck and it trends, they could ride this wave for awhile, and not only make alot of money, not only have people coming to their door to do business, but also sellout everywhere they go (for the most part).
If VH had reunited in 1996 with DLR, they would've easily soldout stadiums everywhere. But their music didn't hold in a way GNR's did, and they were never mainstream media's favorite crazy whore to sensationalize like GN'R was. GN'R is a totally different beast.
In other words, I think GN'R will be able to sell out stadiums internationally, and headline festivals with this lineup for years to come. In North America, I think stadiums initially for the first couple years, but after that I think it'll dwindle to a point it's reverted to either 2/3 full stadiums, or selling out arenas. But even if it's that, they'll pack arenas to the brim.
Whatever it is, they're gonna be rolling in the green. Easy.
My biggest hope is that this is it for GN'R. Even for 10 days, it's been really great to feel PROUD to be a GN'R fan again. For alot of years it was a dirty word, because it was "Axl N' Roses" or "the Axl Rose solo band" or "Rose N' Roses", etc. To be a fan of this band now, I feel like i'm in a place i've never been in in my modern lifetime. I feel like THE BAND is back and that... I don't know... I feel more WHOLE again as a fan. I now look at GN'R again, the same way I look at Soundgarden or AIC or Pearl Jam or Metallica, etc.
#670 Re: Guns N' Roses » Salon Reunion article » 564 weeks ago
Okay... so I listened intently to the live videos. Specifically listened -- I did not watch. I listened to as much of the nuances as I could.
First off, that performance of Nightrain with Slash & The Conspirators might be the best Nightrain performance i've heard of them. Myles voice hits everything right, and Slash... jeezus... I got depressed listening to it. Slash sounded A-M-A-Z-I-N-G. He was such a beast on lead guitar, and especially that amazing solo (that he wrote), that it sounded even better today than it did back in the day. It reminded me when Bucket finally found his groove and just SLAYED the song during the latter part of the 2002 leg.
However I stand by my original statement. Slash is such a BEAST of a lead player, that he plays ALL of the lead that he's involved with, which GN'R fans haven't seen -- AT ALL -- since 1993. So much to a point that there's a generation of GN'R fans who have never seen it live under the Guns N' Roses banner... ever. I think this is the problem. I was depressed watching it, because THIS is what GN'R has been missing since 1993 -- Slash. Nobody plays those songs like he does. It's not Izzy. It's Slash.
However, you take Slash from The Conspirators, and they are suddenly Sammy Hagar's backing band with Myles Kennedy on vocals. GN'R on the other hand have far more capable players. Frank, Tommy, Richard, Dizzy, and/or Robin or Ron is there was another lead. It's just the better band.
Slash is the missing ingredient. But Axl's had a helluva band, in any incarnation, since 2001.

.