You are not logged in. Please register or login.

#731 Re: Guns N' Roses » Axl Rose/Dexter forum chat discussion thread » 909 weeks ago

buzzsaw wrote:
NY Giants82 wrote:

If someone can find something negative in what Axl did last night, then that's really all you need to know about them. This is a GOOD thing.

What he did isn't necessarily negative.  A lot of what he said can certainly be taken as negative.

Come on man!  Give the guy a break.

#732 Re: Guns N' Roses » Axl Rose/Dexter forum chat discussion thread » 909 weeks ago

NickNasty2009 wrote:

Axl gets props here...btw, anyone think he is just a little pissed at Merck?

Yeah.  I don't think they'll be sending each other Christmas cards.  14  As for those complaining about Axl doing this.  I mean come on!  The guy takes some time to come on boards to chat with the fans.  He doesn't have to do this.  I'm sure he has other things to do.  I liked his explanation on going on stage late.  As for Catcher.  I hope he elaborates more.  And of course I hope he elaborates more on new songs.  Axl get tons of praise from me for doing this.  If I'M gonna talk about the bad stuff I'm gonna talk about the good as well.

#733 Re: Guns N' Roses » Axl Rose/Dexter forum chat discussion thread » 909 weeks ago

Cool ofAxl to do this.  Any info is appreciated.  Although I have been predicting a reunion, I'm glad to see it may be farther than I thought.  Thanks Axl.  Hope to have another album next year.

#734 Re: Guns N' Roses » AXL Posting on GNR Forums! » 909 weeks ago

I think it's cool of Axl to take some time to post on the forums.  The guy can't do everything wrong.  So kudos to Axl¸.

#735 Re: Guns N' Roses » NIN imploding? Finck coming back? (NOPE!) » 909 weeks ago

Axlin08 wrote:

If they want the new band to go on, they need to throw it all at Bucket.

If they are doing that with Robin - they are wasting their time.

Amen!  Trent can keep Finck.  I can think of at least 10 guitarists who would be better picks than Finck.

#736 Re: Guns N' Roses » what are we disappointed with? » 909 weeks ago

GNRBABY wrote:
Saikin wrote:

I think CC has a strong way of looking at this.  It's a well founded view.  I'm pretty sure most of us aren't wanting Axl to be Bon Jovi- at least i know i'm not wanting him to do a country album anytime ever.

CC does not have a well founded point, what he says makes no sense. I would love to hear Axl do a country record, that wouldn't make him "Bon Jovi", it would just make all the "marks" scratch their heads... I don't think most of you even understand what the hell I'm talking about. Just ignore me and continue on with your useless and pointless off-base observations and opinions....It don't really matter

While I want to see Axl make more music I do NOT repeat do NOT wanna see him make country albums.  And it's nothing against country music cause there is some good country music.  But Axl is not a country artist but a rock artist therefore I wanna see Axl make some good rock music.

#737 Re: Guns N' Roses » what are we disappointed with? » 909 weeks ago

Speaking of lack of promos.  I think I read somewhere that Axl promised Jarmo an interview once the album would be released.  Read that a couple years ago.  Anybody remember this and anybody knows if this will ever materialize?

#738 Re: Guns N' Roses » what are we disappointed with? » 909 weeks ago

Communist China wrote:

Nothing changed when CD came out and the musicians Axl has now aren't capable of making music like the 01 line-up was. ChiDem was supposed to validate newGNR as a new beginning, but instead it's reliance on players who are no longer in Guns validates the 'it's Axl solo' theory. I thought CD would change things, but it changed nothing.

Sure the album's awesome. But instead of re-launching GNR, it signals its final and complete cretaive death.

Well Axl should've never have released this under GNR.  This should've been a solo record or under another band name.  But hey it's his call.

#739 Re: Guns N' Roses » system of a down on gnr » 909 weeks ago

Well I hope that means that the guys of System of a down knows something we don't cause I want a SOAD reunion.

#740 Re: Guns N' Roses » what are we disappointed with? » 909 weeks ago

I'm disappointed in the fans.  And this is coming from a guy who according to madagas is very negative.  tongue  So the album didn't sell a trillion copies.  So what?  It dropped out of the top 10 already.  So what?  It doesn't have a single that'll take this to the top.  So fucking what?!  And this I love could surprise as a single.  Fans wanted this album for the longest of times, and now that they have it, they're still not happy.  I ain't happy that there was no promo done by Axl for the album.  But life goes on.  And I'd rather have lower sales and have a good album than it selling a trillion copies and suck.  I got the album.  I'm happy.  Sure it would've been a better experience if Axl would've done interviews and tell us who is in the band and done some promo.  But he didn't.  And I'll be happy if another album is dropped on us next year (Hey a guy can dream).  If they do another CD tour, I'll be disappointed but won't care cause I won't go cause really I can't afford to spend big $ to see a repeat show.  But if they do a tour for another album that'll be released.  Then perhaps I would consider attending a show.  But in the end people.  Just enjoy the album and be happy we got it.  Only other thing to hope is that Axl will release more music faster and that he'll be happy to do so.

Board footer

Powered by FluxBB