You are not logged in. Please register or login.
- Topics: Active | Unanswered
#921 Re: Guns N' Roses » 11-21-2012 The Joint, Las Vegas (Being filmed in 3D) » 645 weeks ago
This is only days away... anybody here pre-ordering it? I am definitely thinking about getting it. Come on... it's the first GN'R release since 2008, and the first live video release since 1992.
#922 Re: The Sunset Strip » Breakng Bad/Better Call Saul » 645 weeks ago
I don't think this show will ever be compared to the "great" Sopranos.
And when I say great... what I actually mean is OVER-RATED Sopranos. The last two years of the Sopranos were utter shit, especially the last year. The first year was overrated, and the prime of the show was NEVER what it was reputed to be.
The point is THE SHIELD was a FARRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRR BETTER series than either of these two (although I got major love for Breaking Bad), and The Shield will never make a Top-10 list, nor will it ever eclipse The Sopreenos.
I'm sorry, but i'm just so goddamn sick of hearing about The Sopranos. What an overrated show. One of the greatest ones to ever air, but the best? Puhleeze. Andy Griffith, All In The Family, early-era Happy Days & early-era Dallas, The Rockford Files (where David Chase got his start), Hill Street Blues, early-era A-Team, Miami Vice, The Equalizer, Tales From The Crypt, The X-Files, Wiseguy, Seinfeld, NYPD Blue, Everybody Loves Raymond, early-era Simpsons, the first few years of Stargate SG-1, 24 (even today), The Shield, Deadwood, Breaking Bad...
Then I might tack on The Sopranos.
#923 Re: Guns N' Roses » Matt Sorum open to Playing with Current GNR Line-up » 645 weeks ago
And I STILL don't believe Axl hated Slash's fame.... the way you and others think.
I think Axl was proud to have Slash be the biggest and the baddest rock n' roll guitarist of all time.... Axl's way. GNR's way.
Slash would play with fucking Santa Claus if there was a check in it. Slash was obviously VERY influence by Kiss, because like Kiss wanted to be Coca-Cola, Slash wanted to be KISS-popular and had no problem doing whatever it took to get there (other than Glee).
I think Axl hated Slash playing with guys like Michael Jackson (which Axl turned around and did an interview recently citing Jackson as an influence and one of his favorite vocalists/performers)
I think Axl correlated GNR's image with HIS image of GN'R and when Slash did things that countered that... he was on Axl's shit list, and Axl resented him.
Yes it was about Ego, but not in the way you or the media depicts it. I think Axl truely had a vision, and from 1996 onward... all of it turned to shit.
#924 Re: Guns N' Roses » Time for the reunion » 645 weeks ago
polluxlm wrote:-D- wrote:Axl prob thought Slash would fail and become a has been where are they now....beg Axl back and fall in line. Didnt happen.
Actually it was the other way around. Slash left remember? He was the one thinking Axl would give in. That's why he came around 10 years later saying "Axl had won the war". He viewed that whole thing as a battle.
It exagerrates the story a bit. First of all, Axl quit first, then Slash didn't join his new band (with the same name, Guns N' Roses). Second, I highly doubt all the words of the Axl camp, and the "Slash confessed that Axl won the war" bullshit came from them. I don't think that Slash would have said anything regarding this, and I doubt even more that he used these words. He may see it this way, who knows. But all of us followed this saga in the past 2 decades, so it's sure that the Axl camp likes to twist everything that happened or hasn't even happened and they see it as a WAR AGAINST EVIL, for sure, and they see every action legal, acceptable, normal and deserved against the devil. Even their lies.
Here is the exact quote, I'm still unsure if Slash used the word "war", or it's only the Axl camp's translation.
"Slash came to inform Axl that: 'Duff was spineless,' 'Scott [Weiland] was a fraud,' that he 'hates Matt Sorum' and that in this ongoing war, contest or whatever anyone wants to call it that Slash has waged against Axl for the better part of 20 years, that Axl has proven himself 'the stronger.' Based on his conduct in showing up at Rose's home, Axl was hopeful that Slash would live up to his pronouncements that he wanted to end the war and move on with life. Unfortunately that did not prove to be the case."
This is one of the rare rare cases I agree wholeheartedly with Mikka in the Axl vs. Slash debate.
I don't buy for a flat fucking second that Slash said what he said to Beta. Now I do believe that Slash showed up at Axl's house WITH THOSE INTENTIONS of trying to resolve he and Axl's issues, especially considered Axl lied about it later, then recanted and said, "well I was there, but... it didn't happen like that", which made Slash lose more credibility in it, so much to the point Axl could've said anything he wanted to about Slash at that point, and I would've believed him, because it was another classic Slash lying moment (of which there are many).
I think Slash cares SO FUCKING LITTLE about Axl's feelings that Slash could care less about a 'war' and if there was one, i'm sure Slash's own ego would allow him to prevail as the king of all champions, simply because he's popular and Axl isn't. I think popularity is VERY important to Slash, way more so than Axl... but... Axl isn't entirely immune to wanting to be popular.
But I do believe with Slash's statements, Axl's lack of having an ACTUAL family life and not his weird "i'm not gay, but I might as well be" my housekeeper's son is my best friend San Francisco weird family life that he has, and Axl's lack of having an actual musical point in living, led to Axl probably having many late-night play-around tirade discussions with "Mom" about what a self-centered tube steak Slash was, and Beta just encouraged it (i'm assuming).
Eventually this leads Axl to believe that Slash believes this is some sort of war, because by self-admittance, Axl was a GN'R Forum junkie in these days buying into all of our wartime discussions. Axl starts to buy into the illusion of all of this, and when Slash showed up, Axl in an almost tongue-in-cheek satirization moment of them media bakes up this press release as if anyone gave a fuck.
Instead, it made everyone look like bitter old maids. Slash looked like a wimpy liar, and Axl played almost literally right into the media's definition of him as a douche. And the thought of slagging Duff, Scott Weiland & Matt in the process simply made Axl & Slash BOTH look bad, because VR were left to "wonder" about what Slash said, and Axl even if he was delivering absolute truth about Slash's statements... played right into looking like Axl, and it looked like a backdoor way for Axl to try and stir up shit and try to break up VR himself, a band which pretty much every insider said Axl could not stand one bit, all the way down to Slash & Duff recycling songs from the 1994-95 period for those albums.
#925 Re: Guns N' Roses » Time for the reunion » 645 weeks ago
Maybe Axl simply didn't like having such a strong commanding member in the band. Someone more beloved than him, kind of like Angus Young and AC/DC... Slash's popularity gave him a level of power. Perhaps Axl didn't like that.
I don't buy that for a second. Duff told a story back in the day when a bunch of fans ran up to Axl & Duff and basically everyone ran right past Duff and all wanted Axl's autograph. Axl obliged, but tried to encourage them to go get Duff's autograph, after all he's in the band too.
I'm sorry, but Axl has NEVER struck me as a narcissist. Slash has a corner on the market on that imo. If anyone ever associated with GN'R was in the ballpark you speak of, it'd be Slash imo, with Axl at the bottom of the list.
I think Axl actually would RATHER be left alone.
Now on the power grab front, I don't buy it either. In several of Axl's interviews whether directly or indirectly in the last 20-25 years, he basically alluded to wishing someone had just taken the ball/initiative to help guide the band. Axl complained that Slash & Duff wanted equal say in the band, but back in the day did nothing but party and had absolutely nothing to do with business discussions as far back as 1989, at least.
Axl was then accused of stealing the band and being a dictator, but yet the royalty distribution proves Axl was never trying to cut out the band, but in fact management and any other blood sharks that threatned the (at that point) global business brand that Guns N' Roses had become.
Slash & Duff (pre-rock minister of finance) wanted nothing to do with that shit, other than drugs, pussy and rock n' roll. They were still young and immature, while Axl was thrust into a world where "someone's got to take the responsibility to go to the meetings" he complained about.
When the dust settled, if you put all the work in, you do all the studying to try and make sure the band doesn't get robbed blind, you aren't going to feel entitled to the brand name's ownership to ensure its survival?
Based on everything i've read, if there was anything Axl DID EARN without any doubt, or thievery... it was the band name.
-D- wrote:Axl prob thought Slash would fail and become a has been where are they now....beg Axl back and fall in line. Didnt happen.
Or maybe he's glad to be rid of him. They don't get along.
This x a million. All these people that think Axl's "obsessed with Slash", is simply not true imo. Axl was 'disappointed' in Slash, and let down imo. Feeling betrayed might even be a stronger word. But it was THE WAY Slash went about it, that buried him perminately with Axl, and that was ALL Slash's fault. Slash didn't just leave. If you look back over the interviews back then, Slash was already openly slagging Axl in the press in little passive-aggressive ways, and it was obvious in hind-sight looking back over those words then, that there was trouble in paradise. This didn't go over well with Axl, nor did Slash's difficulty in hardlining his material as "take it or leave it" that it buried any music they wrote or recorded during that late 1993-to-late 1995 period. Again, Axl is pissed. Then Slash quits, which in Axl's eyes is saying "I want a divorce". Slash doesn't just stop there, he proceeds to encourage Axl's persona with the media as a tyranical dick (something that has haunted Axl from day one), and beat into the ground until the present day.
The irony in all of this, is EVERY SINGLE PERSON (Alan Niven & Stephanie Seymour) have all but recanted their feelings towards Axl in the present day. The same people that encouraged that media bullshit persona of him, turned around and said he was a "great guy". Erin Everly, a bitch who supposedly had the shit kicked out of her, kicked in the stomach to miscarry a baby, destroyed property, had her life threatened, gagged with a ball gag, tied up, fucked in the ass repeatedly and thrown in a closet.... still took a girlfriend to see him at a show a couple years ago.
I don't think Axl is the villian here. I think we're dealing with dozens and dozens of liars, not Axl is the cause of all the problems. All of these people basically backed off on their "fuck Axl" stance. Even Slash who goes back and forth between, "I love Axl", and "Axl is a dictator.... but I love 'em xoxoxo"
With every passing year, the more time vindicates Axl again and again.
Axl wanted to be rid of Slash and is more than happy he's gone. Called him "a cancer" for God's sake. He also said he loved him, so maybe even for Axl it goes back and forth. But in the band? No, I think Axl doesn't really ever want Slash back in the band full time. I think Axl is happy with Duff, but I think Axl is just fine with Slash & Izzy being part-timers with GN'R. Izzy because he's so unrealiable, and Slash because of drama. It's like having your ex-wife around your new wife, 20 years after the divorce.
He's glad to be rid of him, but also bitter about what a Slashless GN'R turned out to be. They were on top of the world and Axl could never understand how Slash would want to throw that away, even less so how he feels Slash tried to bring him down with him.
This
I don't think Axl wants or wanted Slash back. Maybe initially, but once it sunk in, he rolled with it. I think what Axl HATED and drove him nuts was that Slash's presence in not being in GN'R would become a curse for Axl. He tried to reboot the band into a totally different think ala Halloween III, and like Halloween III, it pissed Axl off that virtually everyone, including the business, hated that 1998-2002 GN'R, 21st-century modern-rock/prog-rock/industrial GN'R.
And Axl blamed Slash for it. The industry and the label were doing everything for him with Chinese, including $14 million investment... until.... they heard it. Then they wanted to bury it and distance themselves from it. Legendary producers didn't even want to work on it, because it wasn't the GN'R they were prepared for. So while Slash was selling out and doing "Set Me Free" for The Hulk with Scott Weiland and VR, Axl's over there looking at it as that top-hatted bastard PUT ME in this situation, and nobody is giving Chinese or the band, the push it deserves.
And he blamed Slash.
BUT... in defense of Slash, Axl's insistence on tinkering with every little thing on Chinese, put Axl in his own quagmire of an album. I remember when Axl told Kurt Loder post-VMA's in 2002 that Chinese was basically nowhere near ready... lolz... Chinese should've already been out for a year at the time that they played the VMA's. Even then it was a year past due.
That kind of shit is what buried Axl in reality.
#926 Re: Guns N' Roses » Time for the reunion » 645 weeks ago
Slash may lie about stupid shit, but when he says he is going to put out an album and tour the world, he does it.
Except when the band is called Velvet Revolver.
Smoking Guns wrote:Slash may lie about stupid shit, but when he says he is going to put out an album and tour the world, he does it.
Yeah, reading the detailed posts before yours, I can see valid points about Slash's shady character.
But at the end of the day, as fans of both Axl and Slash's music, isn't all we want is new music from them?Slash gives us all that and then some, but Axl uses every excuse under the sun to NOT give us new music.
I don't know either Axl or Slash personally, and probably never will, so regardless of their so called "characters", all I want from both of them (if they can never work together again) is new music.And I'm sorry, but until Axl changes his tune, Slash wins on that front.
And I can totally see that point as well. Axl's silence, although I feel that Axl stays silent because he feels "his truth" seems to backfire on him constantly or is twisted into something pro-Slash or anti-Axl so the media can sell newstories, Axl's silence backfires on him, because in our society, silence ALWAYS equals = guilt. It actually doesn't, but all of us are a bunch of lazy, self-judging, douchebags and it's just easier that way for us to equate silence and guilt or arguing for privacy equals guilt. That's another one.
#927 Re: Guns N' Roses » Matt Sorum open to Playing with Current GNR Line-up » 645 weeks ago
I never once said Axl took the band in the right direction, but I bet you my left nut that if Slash had gotten the name, the band would be worse off than it is now. Slash would've had garbage like Eric Dover or whatever hack this week, fronting the band, called Guns N' Roses, recording whatever come to mind, driving down the quality of the band, when unless a Chris Cornell-type writer would've been willing to work with GN'R (or front them in replacement of Axl), to at least compare to Axl's writing style.
Axl with GN'R (and no players) = no new albums, and a destruction of the name based on the lack of work with tribute shows
Slash with GN'R (with the band and no Axl) = a Rolling Stones-level of output without 50-80% of the lyrical writing team, destroying the name into Skid Row-level obscurity
When I say -- "I'll take Axl" -- that's what's in my mind when I think it
And I will totally agree that Axl made his own bed. I don't think people left him, like Robin, Bucket, Tommy (off and on), Ron (?), Josh Freese, Brain etc. because Axl was a tyrant. Many of these people had almost GLOWING things to say about Axl, as opposed to his almost Mel Gibson-level reputation. Axl's lack of regularly working caused most of these people to walk out the door, and that I blame Axl and the label for both equally. I think Axl takes too long, and is a maladaptive perfectionist, with a severe procrastination issue. But I fully believed and said (even before Axl did), that the label forced and virtually blackmailed Axl to try and get a reunion out of him, with basically an ultimatum of "reunite, and we'll promote your album", Axl-"no", Uni-"well then we can't help you, nor will we let you out of your contract, nor will we let you go record as Axl Rose", etc.
Axl might've out foxed the band legally... but he didn't out fox the music business one damn bit. They whipped his ass. The only difference is Axl picked up his teeth and hat, and walked home never to return, rather than submit to the business like Slash.
Whatever Axl's reasons for doing that, are a mystery to this day. But pussy ain't one of them imo. I think Axl still has a good reason, and lack of talent or ability ain't one of them either.
#928 Re: Guns N' Roses » GnR in Vegas 2014 » 645 weeks ago
I really love Ron as a person, but originally I called him "Gilby Clarke of Shredders" and I think I was spot on. A great ambassador for the band, but I just don't dig the guy as a guitarist. Slash originally, and incorrectly labeled Buckethead as "no feel"... Bucket's got as much feel and soul as Slash.
Ron is one that I just cannot for the life of me identify his feel/soul as a guitarist. Even his all original/rearrangements on Chinese were forgettable (he ruined Catcher, and Axl should've been SHOT of entertaining altering Brian May--wtf-x-infinity).
I enjoy SOME of Ron's takes (Estranged for one), but I this current band (right now), Richard is the super-star. Robin was a waste as well, and I am honest, I do miss the days of looking forward to hearing a guitar take, and that hasn't been in the band since Bucket sadly. Hopefully Richard gets more and more to do in the band.
#929 Re: Guns N' Roses » Matt Sorum open to Playing with Current GNR Line-up » 645 weeks ago
Smoking Guns wrote:Just pisses me off when Axl gets his cake and can eat it too.
That's how he wanted it. He holds all the cards. It sucks, but this "lack of backbone" everyone is crying about is exactly why this situation is here. No one could stand up to Axl then or now.
And I fuckin' love it. Ol' JR himself would be proud. I have very little sympathy for these guys. They SIGNED AWAY THEIR NAMESAKE!
Come ON! How can you do that? And Slash later had two different stories about it, Matt had a story then later admitted (oh wait, I don't own part of the name), and Duff agreed with Slash's story until his book came out, and in it he had an entirely different timeline.
Yet there's 'ol Axl, with the same consistent story. No matter how scum bag, scandalous, or dastardly he was in securing it, he got for a variety of reasons, all of which come back to either A) Weakness on the band members, B) drugs, C) lies, or D) a combination of all of the above.
Slash's response was "what's in a name? What's the band without the players" ... really? That's the excuse? You pussed out bro, and gave away the biggest thing you were ever apart of.
Slash did. Seems like he is the only one with a backbone.
Oh please, Slash was the biggest pussy of the bunch. Even IF you believe Slash's story, (let's assume we both do), he basically laid over and gave away his fucking creation, not to Axl, but to Doug fucking GOLDSTEIN.
That's how much of a pussy Slash is. He couldn't even stand up to the Harley Quinn of Axl's Joker.
Slash didn't stand up to Axl. Slash didn't say ONE FUCKING WORD (according to him) of his issues with Axl (neither did Axl).
Slash quit and ran, as did Izzy. Then suddenly grew a pair of balls in the fucking press, without ever talking to Axl.
P-U-S-S-I-E-S every fucking one of them. Even Axl sent his male secretary to deliever the news. The least Axl could've did was donned a pair of $2,000 cowboys boots and a Stetson hat, dropped 3 bricks of China White in Slash's bag on an international flight (in South America) once he was busted, visited him in jail (butt rape SA prison) and said "i'll bail you out right now, just sign on the dotted line"
That's how it's done
#930 Re: Guns N' Roses » Time for the reunion » 646 weeks ago
Slash strikes me as a guy who truely doesn't know what he did wrong.... until you push him into a corner. I've known many people like him in my life, friends & family, and sadly my own father. I'm not one of those "placing my own problems on another situation"-guy, but come on, i've spent 20 years watching this war, and I see the behavior patterns of Axl & Slash... it's pretty similar. I predict their responses before they even make them.
Whether that makes me an expert or not, I dunno, but it's just my opinion.
For me, Slash is probably one of those self-centered, me first guys--who just doesn't realize he's that guy-BECAUSE HE'S SO "GO WITH THE FLOW".
I had to ALL CAPS that one because it really is very important. There are so many people I know that are passive, and because they are passive, they think they are selfless. Nope... not the same thing.
"Axl was a dicatator"
So fucking what? I've heard this excuse from Slash pretty much since Izzy said it. I haven't heard one reason why "Axl being a dictator" was such a bad thing. When Axl came out and explained some of his behavior later on, it sounded like Axl was trying to do what he could to save the band (family). Can't fault him for that, especially if Slash was more interested in fucking off, shooting drugs, partying, and never taking responsibility.
Then when, in Axl's eyes, Slash causes all the friction, not by WHAT HE DID, but WHAT HE DIDN'T DO. How many women/wives have broken up with their man, because of their inaction/motivation, not because of an active act? NUMEROUS, and I think that's the case here.
Slash doesn't remember what he did to piss Axl off. And Axl can't give you a specific thing, because there's so much water under the bridge, specifically with Slash, that Axl could write a 500-page book of all the things Slash did that broke that friendship/bond.
To me, Axl's behavior is not that of a man who felt disrespected by an event, but that of a friend who felt disrespected by MANY events that seemed like little things at the time that amounted and amounted and amounted to the point of Axl just not talking to him. Even in Slash's auto-bio, he references moments when he'd do certain things or say certain things that, like Slash getting Axl a straight-jacket for his birthday, that Slash thought was funny, but it went all over Axl and Axl just eyeballed him, and refused to talk to him later, were obvious moments of Axl feeling Slash and his relationship had real problems, and Slash making a joke of it was just blowing off Axl's feelings. Then again, Axl is the same guy that Slash willingly let sleep on his grandmother's couch when he was flat broke, and when she tried to get him up in the middle of the day from an all-nighter, he told her to fuck off. So maybe Axl's the self-cented one?
Regardless, I agree with ID. I think Slash doesn't know how to answer that question, and it mainly lies in the fact that he passive aggressively just doesn't give a flying fuck. Slash cares about Slash, and Axl cares about Axl, but I always thought Axl HAD A REASON for feeling that way, dating all the way back to Indiana. Slash cares about Slash for the obvious reasons... he's a dick. Self-advancement, entitled, take your pick.
Even the way Slash describes himself in interviews and in his own auto-bio, like the moments with his mother & father, he comes across as oblivious as to how much damage his passive aggressive, obnoxious attitude does to the people around him.
Slash has carried around a Sammy Sosa, "Who Me?" personality for years.
Make no mistake, this is not an anti-Slash post, but more of a take, from an Axl-perspective, of why Axl seems to have such a specific hangup on Slash, and only Slash in comparison to almost everyone else he's worked with or been friends with.
From everything producers, associates, bandmembers, and most media people (when you think about it), Axl has pretty much been vindicated in 2014 as a jovial, generous, caring, funny man, with a striking normal persona, with many remarking how much he's NOT like his back-in-the-day-media/Slash/Izzy/Steven-portrayal.
Yet here we are, with Axl still pretty much letting it be known, whether formally or informally that the ball is in Slash's court, and everytime Slash gets cornered with an Axl question... he choses to re-open the scab every fucking time with the "dictator" comment, which i'm sure Axl reads, rolls his eyes, and is re-affirmed -- "Slash will never get it".
Meanwhile... Slash is on the other side going "yeah but I got a new album, and new songs, and everyone loves me". "I'm popular"...
Yeah, but at what cost? I say this with all the love in my heart, but Slash has always struck me as a one-sided person.
