You are not logged in. Please register or login.

CSS 2.0
 Rep: 35 

Re: US Politics Thread

CSS 2.0 wrote:


*record scratch*


Randall Flagg
 Rep: 116 

Re: US Politics Thread

What will the conspiracy crowd say when Manafort pleads to shit unrelated to the election and Trump and doesn’t “cooperate”?

Are we going to end the farce or try to find something, anything, like Trump paying a porn Star not to go on TV or sell a book, which they did anyway, to make it seem like justice is being served.

Manafort is guilty as fuck. But none of it has anything to do with the election or anything the SC was tasked to investigate.

I guess we just need more time. Maybe assign a second SC to investigate all the women Trump slept with without a condom while married.

mitchejw
 Rep: 110 

Re: US Politics Thread

mitchejw wrote:
Randall Flagg wrote:

What will the conspiracy crowd say when Manafort pleads to shit unrelated to the election and Trump and doesn’t “cooperate”?

Are we going to end the farce or try to find something, anything, like Trump paying a porn Star not to go on TV or sell a book, which they did anyway, to make it seem like justice is being served.

Manafort is guilty as fuck. But none of it has anything to do with the election or anything the SC was tasked to investigate.

I guess we just need more time. Maybe assign a second SC to investigate all the women Trump slept with without a condom while married.

Why are you so painfully unaware of history and how they got to Nixon?

You know when you lost credibility on this topic, RF? When you said that this process shouldn’t take much time at all because technology should speed up the legal system. Then you doubled down and said if it takes longer than that...then that’s an example of government ineptitude.

It told me right there that you had no interest in finding out what Trump did and did not do. You declared him innocent from the get go...

What you’re seeinb here is very similar to what happened in the 1970s. You have a lot of sketchy people with lots to hide....makes you wonder why so much stench surrounds our President doesn’t it?

Oh no...not you. You don’t wonder that.

Randall Flagg
 Rep: 116 

Re: US Politics Thread

mitchejw wrote:
Randall Flagg wrote:

What will the conspiracy crowd say when Manafort pleads to shit unrelated to the election and Trump and doesn’t “cooperate”?

Are we going to end the farce or try to find something, anything, like Trump paying a porn Star not to go on TV or sell a book, which they did anyway, to make it seem like justice is being served.

Manafort is guilty as fuck. But none of it has anything to do with the election or anything the SC was tasked to investigate.

I guess we just need more time. Maybe assign a second SC to investigate all the women Trump slept with without a condom while married.

Why are you so painfully unaware of history and how they got to Nixon?

You know when you lost credibility on this topic, RF? When you said that this process shouldn’t take much time at all because technology should speed up the legal system. Then you doubled down and said if it takes longer than that...then that’s an example of government ineptitude.

It told me right there that you had no interest in finding out what Trump did and did not do. You declared him innocent from the get go...

What you’re seeinb here is very similar to what happened in the 1970s. You have a lot of sketchy people with lots to hide....makes you wonder why so much stench surrounds our President doesn’t it?

Oh no...not you. You don’t wonder that.


So can you list evidence of one person on Trump's team helping Russia during the election.  Cause I can name a member of Clinton's team who paid a British agent to speak with the KGB and create a dossier on Trump of unverified, salacious accusations.

mitchejw
 Rep: 110 

Re: US Politics Thread

mitchejw wrote:
Randall Flagg wrote:
mitchejw wrote:
Randall Flagg wrote:

What will the conspiracy crowd say when Manafort pleads to shit unrelated to the election and Trump and doesn’t “cooperate”?

Are we going to end the farce or try to find something, anything, like Trump paying a porn Star not to go on TV or sell a book, which they did anyway, to make it seem like justice is being served.

Manafort is guilty as fuck. But none of it has anything to do with the election or anything the SC was tasked to investigate.

I guess we just need more time. Maybe assign a second SC to investigate all the women Trump slept with without a condom while married.

Why are you so painfully unaware of history and how they got to Nixon?

You know when you lost credibility on this topic, RF? When you said that this process shouldn’t take much time at all because technology should speed up the legal system. Then you doubled down and said if it takes longer than that...then that’s an example of government ineptitude.

It told me right there that you had no interest in finding out what Trump did and did not do. You declared him innocent from the get go...

What you’re seeinb here is very similar to what happened in the 1970s. You have a lot of sketchy people with lots to hide....makes you wonder why so much stench surrounds our President doesn’t it?

Oh no...not you. You don’t wonder that.


So can you list evidence of one person on Trump's team helping Russia during the election.  Cause I can name a member of Clinton's team who paid a British agent to speak with the KGB and create a dossier on Trump of unverified, salacious accusations.

This is the FOX News stick and pivot move.

It doesn’t matter what i think...that stance is just not convincing anyone RF.

buzzsaw
 Rep: 428 

Re: US Politics Thread

buzzsaw wrote:

I can't believe anyone who voted for a Clinton would want people digging up the past on anyone...I mean there's no way they killed everybody.

We're in a never ending circle of idiocy where both sides are blaming the other for starting it and using that childish approach to justify doing the exact same thing.  Frankly I don't give a fuck who started it, but it has to end.  Anyone defending either side's actions at this point is part of the problem.  That's not straddling the fence mitch (as I know you love to make that accusation because deep down you know it's right); it's kicking the fucking fence down.  Anyone supporting either party's actions are now part of the problem.

Smoking Guns
 Rep: 328 

Re: US Politics Thread

Smoking Guns wrote:
misterID wrote:

The Creepy Porn Lawyer tag under Avenatti the whole time was pretty funny.

Funniest line was Avenatti asking if Tucker had ever watched porn, "I like humiliation porn, that's why I watch you on CNN."

Hahahaha it was funny as hell!!!

mitchejw
 Rep: 110 

Re: US Politics Thread

mitchejw wrote:
buzzsaw wrote:

I can't believe anyone who voted for a Clinton would want people digging up the past on anyone...I mean there's no way they killed everybody.

We're in a never ending circle of idiocy where both sides are blaming the other for starting it and using that childish approach to justify doing the exact same thing.  Frankly I don't give a fuck who started it, but it has to end.  Anyone defending either side's actions at this point is part of the problem.  That's not straddling the fence mitch (as I know you love to make that accusation because deep down you know it's right); it's kicking the fucking fence down.  Anyone supporting either party's actions are now part of the problem.

I wasn’t old enough to vote for Bill? Were you?

I’m not inspired by this...i find it funny that you don’t care who started it. Newt Gingrich started it....being the biggest hypocritical piece of shit to ever bring impeachment to the house floor.

That’s where it starts for me.

slcpunk
 Rep: 156 

Re: US Politics Thread

slcpunk wrote:

Tucker Carlson is the guy who got picked last for every team I'd imagine.

Say what you want about Avenatti, but Trump doesn't tweet about him at all. That says everything you need to know about that. He also was instrumental in getting Cohen taken down quicker IMO.

And Manafort finally flipped today, agreeing to work with the Federal government. More bad news for Trump....just like I say every couple of weeks, it's only going to get worse.

slcpunk
 Rep: 156 

Re: US Politics Thread

slcpunk wrote:
mitchejw wrote:

This is the FOX News stick and pivot move.

It doesn’t matter what i think...that stance is just not convincing anyone RF.

There is  more than ample evidence tying Trump and his associates to Russia. There's also been  transparent conspiracy with Russia by the Trump team. Reported by all major news outlets (except Fox.) It's all been stated in this thread. I'm also quite sure that there will be more that comes from this investigation when it's over.

That's their move though, demanding answers and claiming zero evidence from an investigation that has been notoriously tight lipped. Mueller isn't speaking, so the right wing machine uses that as proof of innocence. In the meantime we have one indictment after another, numerous Trump associates now working with the investigation.

Just like the rest of the GOP who handcuffed themselves to Trump. They're in it too far now to admit they were wrong; that or they don't know any better, they're just stupid. I see examples of both on this thread.  No matter what this yields they'll continue to lie, pivot and stick to their conspiracy theories.

Board footer

Powered by FluxBB