You are not logged in. Please register or login.
- Topics: Active | Unanswered
#61 Re: Guns N' Roses » GNR Should Do A Rolling Stones cover.... » 228 weeks ago
…oh. They stuck a screen up at the start of KOHD.
Seriously guys? I mean, nice gesture. But if there's one thing I thought we could fairly guarantee, it's that the members of Guns N' Roses could cobble together a fucking Rolling Stones cover on the night.
Like, really. Just slap that graphic up on the screen and belt out Jumpin' Jack Flash or something. You all know how to play it.
Up to 15 min these days? If they keep touring and continue like this they could reach 30 min of KOHD in a couple of years...
#62 Re: Guns N' Roses » Will GNR release new music in 2021? » 228 weeks ago
Randall Flagg wrote:So does the release of Absurd "count" as "new music?" Just curious what the consensus is. My opinion is a rehashed song played live in 2001 before being canned doesn't, but that's just my opinion.
Have we really reached the point where GN'R put out an actual new song, and people are splitting hairs over whether it constitutes a new song?
Most definitely yes. It's a new release alright, but not a new song, as it was played live 20 years ago. If they release 'Goodnight Tonight' or 'It Taste Good', they wouldn't really be considered new either, would they?
#63 Re: Guns N' Roses » GNR Release 'Absurd' Single » 231 weeks ago
TheSundanceKid wrote:Did Atlas Shrugged leak? I never heard that if it did.
The General
Seven
Thyme
ZodiacHave always interested me.
When you hear Thyme it won't interest you
I love that 2 min Intro thing. Who knows where they have taken it or what else might have become of it...
#64 Re: Guns N' Roses » GNR Release 'Absurd' Single » 231 weeks ago
I hope this single does ok though. I want this band to be successful now so we get more new music. Last thing we need is this single failing and the band going into a 20 year reboot mode.
If they were truly aiming for success they should have chosen a different song. Hard School or Perhaps. The general public and the casual concert attendees who want to hear SCOM and NR won't dig this track. The song won't get any radio airplay with these lyrics.
Don't get me wrong, I like the song and I'm glad they finally put something out, but they surely can't expect it to be the next Paradise City or Jungle...
They should call the album Not In This Lifetime, cuz this being the first single with Duff and Slash back in the band is a bigger surprise than the reunion tour itself. It's literally the most absurd thing they could have done for a release..
#65 Re: Guns N' Roses » GNR Release 'Absurd' Single » 231 weeks ago
jimmythegent wrote:Looks like Beta is up to her old tricks on Instagram - slagging off and berating fans who aren't feeling the song and dare criticise it ..
I've done a full 180 on it - underwhelmed at first but now loving it on all levels. The band are kicking ten tonnes of ass on this.
Surely that is Duff and only Duff? Frank is as replaceable as a session muso, but surely Duff as a founding member and one of the "big 3" insisted he play the bass parts?
You hear a bass riff melody on its own at a certain part of the song, but I can’t differentiate if that’s him from Stinson. Doesn’t necessarily have the signature Duff chorus bass sound. But I could be mistaken…
Well I guess there is no way to be 100% sure, but since that bass part is new in comparison to the Bumblefoot version it's most definitely Duff.
#66 Re: Guns N' Roses » GNR Release 'Absurd' Single » 231 weeks ago
I think the surprise release is great news! The song choice is highly 'absurd' though. While I'm happy Axl hasn't let go of his vision of the rest of the CD sessions, they would have had "safer" choices in order to create a positive buzz. Oklahoma, Quick Song, D-Tune, well even Hard School. Maybe they chose 'Absurd' because it's the one song where Axl knows he can sing properly live? It wouldn't look good if they put out a new song and Axl can't sing it.
With it being an alternate in the set, just as Hard School, maybe it however also was unplanned and actually happened by chance. Literally a cointoss between the two. Maybe they decided to put out the mp3 only after they noticed that the press were picking up on them playing a new song. That might also explain the sloppy artwork for the single, if it was put together in a hurry.
It's interesting that they haven't changed the song that much from the last leak. It's basically the same just better guitars than what BBF had to offer. Personally I still prefer the 01 version with the other intro and the longer bridge, but it's fine.
What it also shows us that literally nothing is off the table for an album. 
Just imagine...
01.P.R.L (w/o Thyme)
02.Absurd
03.Dub Suplex
04.RealDoll.com
05. Dummy
06.Hard School
07.Eye On You
08.Oh My God
09. Going Down
10.Prom Violence
#67 Re: Guns N' Roses » We don't really expect a new setlist do we? » 232 weeks ago
James wrote:AgesOfTheIce wrote:I can't fucking believe Slither & BHS are still on the setlist. What the actual fuck. If Axl insists on playing covers at least vary it up a bit. Play The Last Fight or Messages, VR tracks that would go better with his current voice. If you still need to play Soundgarden, play RATYW or something. Slash keep shredding and getting more technical, give him a challenge.
Nobody cares about The Last Fight and even less care about Messages. You want them playing VR deep cuts and B sides in 2021?!?
The audience would think they are brand new songs. This would cause any potential that Hardschool has to be squandered.
When looking at things such as set lists, you have to stop looking at it from a hardcore fan perspective.
It's not about hardcore fans anymore and hasn't been for a long time. It's about casual fans and will be until the end of the line.
Hell....GNR management...which literally spent nearly 20 years obsessed with forums....no longer gives the tiniest of shits about them.
They only care about social media...which is where casual fans reside.
They aren't seeing requests for VR deep cuts on social media....and wouldn't play them if they did.
Do you know what they're seeing on social media?
Jungle....SCOM....PC....NR.... Patience.....the occasional mention of something new.
I just hope Hardschool is staying in the set even though I'm not a big fan of it. They're not playing it for hardcores.... they're playing it for a large audience...and there has to be a reason for it.
I don't think evidence backs up your assertion about TB. Fernando spends almost no time on social media, however he held several Q&As on GNR Reddit in 2019 and 2020, and gave a 2 hour interview on the GNFNR discord chat last year. He was still doing MYGNR chats in 2018, and only stopped because he was pissed at the way they handled the leaks.
I get your point about the confusion about VR deep cuts being new songs, so that wouldn't be a great idea. But I doubt there were many requests for Wichita Lineman on social media either, not to mention The Seeker which they've played a thousand times. Speaking of social media, the NITL select of BHS released in December was a laughing stock on both Twitter and Facebook and even had some mainstream music news sites mocking it. If Axl is going to do covers he should at least do ones he can sing well. Just look at Youtube comments on Slither videos, lots of casuals not impressed at all with that chorus.
They should finally try Fall To Pieces. Apart from Slither it's the only other well known VR song, and it could sound like classic GN'R if Axl manages to sing it halfway decent...
Play two new songs (Hard School and I don't know maybe Perhaps), FTP, Pretty Tied Up, Ain't It Fun, and Dust N' Bones with Duff singing along with standard hits and you have a setlist that pleases almost everybody. The casuals and the hardcores...
And if you're at it, release one of the new songs as a digital single and you might even get a buzz on social media. Doesn't matter what the song is. Even Hard School would do...
#68 Re: Guns N' Roses » Wtf happened to … I.R.S. » 234 weeks ago
I loved the leak we got in 2006, and the live version was even better. I still feel the album version is boring in comparison. It has lost energy.
The three leaks IRS, TWAT, Better were perfect in those versions. They should have been the singles in 2003...
#69 Re: Guns N' Roses » Richard Fortus Interview on Guns N' Roses » 279 weeks ago
Thanks for sharing!
I love how he speaks of the chemistry with Robin in 2006. You could tell listening to their guitar duet in the set then. I wonder if CD had had a better chance of coming out then if Bumblefoot hadn't been brought in. (And Axl hadn't felt he needed yet another guitar player on the album...)
#70 Re: Guns N' Roses » Matt Sorum's book leaks online. » 290 weeks ago
thank you!!

